潜势能蒸发散经验公式之最佳化比较-高苑科技大学.PDF

Optimum Comparison of Empirical Equations for Calculating Potential Evapotranspiration [1] [2] [3] 葉 李 Hsin-Fu Yeh[1] Jin-Fa Chen[2] Cheng-Haw Lee[3] [1] 立 Doctoral Student, Department of Resources Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701, Taiwan, ROC. [2] 立理理 Assistant Professor, Department of Information Management, Kao Yuan Institute of Technology, Kaohsiung 821, Taiwan, ROC. [3] 立() Professor, Department of Resources Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701, Taiwan, ROC. (Corresponding Author) E-mail: leech@mail.ncku.edu.tw 量 (potential evapotranspiration) 參數例 不理論 Penman-Monteith 立參數 度 (temperature-based model) Blancy-Criddle Hargreaves and Samani Kharrufa 輻 (radiation-based model) Makkink Priestley and Taylor Hargreaves 來參數 輻 狀 Penman-Monteith 度輻 Abstract Potential evapotranspiration is to play an important role of water budget model in unsaturated zone. In this study, various empirical equations for calculating potential evapotranspiration with different theory model are compared with the Penman-Monteith equation using daily meteorological data from Tainan meteorological station. There are two basic categories for evaluating the potential evapotranspiration which are used for optimization in-situ parameters: temperature-based model and radiation-based model. Temperature-based model is including Blancy-Criddle method, Hargreaves and Samani method, and Kharrufa method; Radiation-based model is including Makkink method, Priestley and Taylor method, and Ha