付鸣剑 度的现状及立法构想(Pay status and legislation of Mingjian).docVIP

付鸣剑 度的现状及立法构想(Pay status and legislation of Mingjian).doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
付鸣剑 度的现状及立法构想(Pay status and legislation of Mingjian)

付鸣剑 度的现状及立法构想(Pay status and legislation of Mingjian) Fu Mingjian (presiding judge of Li Zhuang case): present situation and legislative conception of criminal witness testifying system in our country Published time: 2010-1-3 19:39:00 reading times: 156 The judge is the presiding judge of Li Zhuang case, specially reproduced this article. Fu Mingjian: present situation and legislative conception of criminal witness testifying system in our country - modern law, Vol. twenty-second, October 2000, issue fifth Catalog I. The present situation of criminal witness testifying system Two, the legislative conception of criminal witness system Three. References Content summary Witness testimony is one of the required evidence in the criminal procedure law of our country. It is an important means used to find out the facts of the case, disclose and verify the crime, and guarantee the innocence of the criminal. It not only requires the witness to reflect the facts of the case truthfully, but also requires the witnesses to express it in a certain form. At present, in our judicial practice, witness testimony usually adopts written testimony, but the written testimony lacks authenticity and has little credibility. It reflects the facts of the case unilaterally and can not provide more protection for the openness, impartiality and transparency of the case review process. To some extent, it is not conducive to the proceeding of the lawsuit and can not guarantee the legitimate rights and interests of both parties. In order to find out the case and ensure judicial justice, the witness must appear in court to testify, and the prosecution and defense style of trial also requires the witness to testify in court, which is beneficial to both sides of the witness to testify the testimony of the witness. The present situation of witness appearing in court in our country is not optimistic. It is often used in the form of written testimony instead of witnesses to testify in court. The reasons

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

jgx3536 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:6111134150000003

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档