- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
碳酸锂合并喹硫平治疗双相障碍抑郁发作疗效及安全性探究
碳酸锂合并喹硫平治疗双相障碍抑郁发作疗效及安全性探究[摘要] 目的 探讨碳酸锂合并喹硫平对双相障碍抑郁发作患者的疗效和安全性。 方法 共入组67例双相障碍患者接受为期8周的开放性治疗,将所有入组患者随机分为两组,研究组(37例)采用碳酸锂合并喹硫平治疗,对照组(30例)单用碳酸锂,在基线期,第1、2、4、8周末采用汉密顿抑郁量表(hamilton depression scale,HAMD-17)评定疗效,采用治疗副反应量表(treatment emergent symptom scale,TESS)评定不良反应。 结果 基线期两组HAMD-17评分差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05),研究组和对照组各完成研究31例和25例。在治疗后第2、4周研究组比对照组HAMD-17评分下降更明显,差异均有高度统计学意义(均P < 0.01),在治疗第8周后研究组与对照组HAMD-17评分比较差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。两组主要不良反应比较差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。 结论 碳酸锂合并喹硫平较单用碳酸锂治疗双相障碍抑郁发作起效更快,不良反应相当,最终总体疗效相当。
[关键词] 双相抑郁;碳酸锂;喹硫平;疗效;安全性
[中图分类号] R749.4 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1673-7210(2012)01(b)-086-03
Study of efficacy and safety of Lithium Carbonate combined with Quetiapine in the treatment of bipolar depression
JIANG Yulong1 WU Zhiguo2 SU Yousong2 YI Zhenghui2 WANG Zucheng2 LU Weihong2▲
1.The Mental Health Center of Minhang District, Shanghai 201112, China; 2.The Mental Health Center Affiliated to School of Medicine of Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200030, China
[Abstract] Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of Lithium Carbonate combined with Quetiapine in the treatment of bipolar depression. Methods 67 outpatients with bipolar depression were chosen and taken open treatment for 8 weeks. All patients were randomly divided into two groups. The study group (37 cases) was given Lithium Carbonate combined with Quetiapine, and the control group (30 cases) was given Lithium Carbonate only. The efficacy and adverse reactions at baseline, end of 1st, 2nd, 4th, and 8th week after the treatment were assessed by hamilton depression scale (HAMD-17) and treatment emergent symptom scale (TESS) respectively. Results There were 31 and 25 patients respectively in study group and control group finishing the study. At the baseline, the difference of HAMD-17 scores between research group and control group was no significant (P > 0.05). At the end of 2nd, 4th week after treatment, the HAMD-17 scores in the study group were decreased more significantly than the cont
文档评论(0)