Titles go here in sentence case and may run more than one课件.ppt

Mary Mack, Esq. Corporate Technology Counsel Fios, Inc. July 25, 2008 Lunch Keynote 义禽欠狮省恬饶鸵贺再骋滔怠椽薯寥芍妄停淳荣淌榴荤诲荔兑坷蔼呢翟礼Titles go here in sentence case and may run more than one课件Titles go here in sentence case and may run more than one课件 2 2 Fios Faculty Mary Mack is Corporate Technology Counsel at Fios Inc. She has more than 10 years experience handling electronic material for legal purposes and 20 years experience delivering enterprise-wide software projects with IT departments in publicly-held companies. A member of the Illinois Bar, ACC and the ABAs Section on Litigation, Mack received her J.D. from Northwestern University School of Law (1982) and a B.A. from LeMoyne College in Syracuse, NY. Mack is the author of the book entitled, A Process of Illumination: The Practical Guide to Electronic Discovery, the author of the Sound Evidence blog hosted on DiscoveryR, and is co-authoring a new book on e-Discovery for Corporate Counsel, being published by West this fall.   Mary Mack Corporate Technology Counsel, Fios, Inc. /in/marymack 萍袱疏隙仑滋泻被搪绪吭含放州囊阀否盈煞秤詹勒捧逆捕谊拖垄癌夜袭贴Titles go here in sentence case and may run more than one课件Titles go here in sentence case and may run more than one课件 3 Economic landscape for legal Just in time financing with just in time inventory plus oil Practice area challenges and opportunities De-construction of the legal community De-equitization of partners De-professionalization of paralegals Cases impacting paralegals (priv, holds, reasonable inquiry) Opportunity in chaos Topics 丽贱眶晌汉壮点羌叶羌势坚框翟匡戊猛弟侵景桥耐母揖闹空迫虎擒埔惟成Titles go here in sentence case and may run more than one课件Titles go here in sentence case and may run more than one课件 4 Issue: Outside counsel could not defend themselves without waiver of attorney client privilege Key Rulings: an adversarial relationship was created between client and counsel and privilege was abrogated Significance: More chilling of communication between inside and outside counsel (paralegal at center) Qualcomm v. Broa