苏格拉底在法庭上的申辩（Socratess plea in court）.docVIP

苏格拉底在法庭上的申辩（Socratess plea in court） In 399 BC, three citizens of Athens, consequently, Tucci anyt and Lu hole of the prosecution of Socrates, accused him of endangering society. The first accused his crime: embraced heretical beliefs. This is undoubtedly to incite prejudice (embraced heretical beliefs as an excuse to use than disrespectful as an excuse to more appropriate, because the latter is difficult as the prosecution charges). This charge has been successfully used to attack the philosopher Anaxagoras, and now they have some views on Socrates anaxagoras. This charge is very difficult to set up, because Socrates always abide by the religious etiquette. But Socrates probably pointed out uncoordinated and non value factors of traditional beliefs, and he said Gods voice can also be used as a risk free thinker believer in God spirit. The second accused his crimes, is a more serious crime is: Socrates corruption of the young mans mind. The poor have fabricated some political background. Socratess circle included or once including some right-wing aristocracy, they like Kerry Te Aas, even after death still hated. Once prominent Al Siby Ad J was one of the most closely related to the students of Socrates, now people only remember that he is a traitor against the state. Some people might think it is Socrates guide these individuals to go awry, he also lure other people. Socrates tends to think that public opinion is absurd, which makes him doubt by democracy. One of the important members of Socratess most powerful Anne Matus is accused of democracy. This powerful combination of their charges to Socrates rely mainly on religious and political opposition. They also use hurt people dissatisfied with Socrates, and hope Socratess uncompromising attitude will cause the jury resentment, because the jury is the most love to curry favour and pleading for mercy. The court trial procedures are as follows: the parties must not rely on the statement of his reasons counsels help. Th