从经济效益和指导方针试论小发动机研制中的几个问题（From the problems of economic benefits and guidelines on the development of small engine）.docVIP

从经济效益和指导方针试论小发动机研制中的几个问题（From the problems of economic benefits and guidelines on the development of small engine） For ease of research, the range of the small engine described herein is tentatively scheduled to be less than 3000 horsepower (2 million 200 thousand) Turboprop (turboprop) turboprop engines, with a force of less than 147, dry (1500 kg) turbojet and turbofan engines. When our country developed advanced fighter engines in 90s, it was necessary and possible to carry out a small number of small engines What is the advantage of developing a small engine according to Chinas national conditions? How should the development of small engines be carried out in the future? These are the problems that our comrades in the engine industry are concerned about. My personal views are as follows: First, from 90s forecast technology, economic development prospects, the development of large and small engines compared to problems 1) the technical difficulties of developing a small engine are few and the risk is small After 90s, we continued to develop a policy based on fighter engines, which is the need for national defense and beyond reproach. But in the future The technical requirements for Fighter engines were higher than in 80s, according to the US 2000 aviation technology outlook Symposium The flying speed of the advanced fighter will be increased to 3.5 Maher, which will be used for inlet, compressor, combustion chamber, turbine and so on Higher requirements have been put forward, only on the basis of technology in 80s, in terms of aerodynamic characteristics, weight reduction, high temperature material, variable number And whats more, there will be new breakthroughs in cooling technology so as to meet the requirements of the next generation of new fighter engines. For example, turbine inlet temperature Require more than 1920K, the total pressure of single rotor ratio is 9 - 16, for light weight structure, 16 - thrust to weight ratio of 20, technology More difficult.