牡丹江生态条件下不同基因型烤烟品种香气物质含量比较.PDFVIP

2010-10 ，31 （5 ） 中国烟草科学 Chinese Tobacco Science 29 1 1* 2 3 1 4 1 [1. 450002 2. 200082 3. 157011 4. 157011] 9 CF202NC89911-217581Y8303JY-029625LJ237 Y8303CF202NC89911-219625JY-02LJ2377581CF202NC89 Y8303 S572.02 1007-5119201005-0029-05 DOI 10.3969/j.issn.1007-5119.2010.05.006 The Comparison on the Content of Aroma Substances in Different Genotypic Flue-cured Tobacco Leaves under the Ecological Conditions of Mudanjiang 1 1* 2 3 1 4 1 QIN Weipu , ZHAO Mingqin , QU Yongsheng , WEN Xuedong , ZHAO Jinheng , YUAN Ye , WANG Dong [1.Tobacco college of Henan Agricultural University, National Tobacco Cultivation ＆Physiology ＆Biochemistry Research Center, Zhengzhou 450002, China; 2.Technology Center of Tobacco Company of Shanghai, Shanghai 200082, China; 3.Tobacco Leaves Company of Mudanjiang, Mudanjiang 157011, China; 4.Heilongjiang Tobacco Research Institute, Mudanjiang 157011, China] Abstract: Effects of Mudanjiang’s ecological condition on aroma substances constituent contents in different genotypic flue-cured tobacco leaves were studied. Results indicated that total neutral aroma constituent contents of upper leaves varied from high to low in the order as CF202, NC89, 911-21, 7581, Y8303, Windel, JY-02, 9625, LJ237, while that of middle leaves was Y8303, Windel, CF202, NC89, 911-21, 9625, JY-02, LJ237, 7581. In conclusion, CF202, NC89 and Y8303 have better leaf qualities and are favorable for promotion and cultivation in Mudanjiang tobacco production zone. Keywords: flue-cured tobacco; genotype; aroma substance 128°02′131°18′ 43°24′45°59′ [1] 230 m