熵指数与脑电双频指数监测全麻患者体位变化时镇静深度的比较.docVIP

熵指数与脑电双频指数监测全麻患者体位变化时镇静深度的比较.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
熵指数与脑电双频指数监测全麻患者体位变化时镇静深度的比较   [摘 要] 目的:观察熵指数和脑电双频指数监测体位变化患者镇静深度的准确性。方法:择期行全麻手术患者120例,年龄25~55岁,BMI 18~24kg/m2,ASA分级I级或II级。无肌松药下丙泊酚复合瑞芬太尼靶控输注诱导气管插管。待维持稳态靶控浓度后10min,将患者置于平卧位、头低脚高位30°、平卧位、头高脚低位30°。每个体位保持15min,间隔5min记录反应熵(RE)、状态熵(SE)、BIS值及HR、MAP、ETCO2、SpO2。结果:两次平卧位BIS、SE、RE值比较,差异无统计学意义;与平卧位比较,头低脚高位BIS、SE值显著升高(P0.05),RE值差异无统计学意义;与平卧位比较,头高脚低位BIS、SE值显著降低(P0.05),RE值差异无统计学意义;与头低脚高位比较,头高脚低位BIS、SE值显著降低(P0.05),RE值差异无统计学意义。结论:体位因素对熵指数的影响小于对脑电双频指数的影响,与脑电双频指数相比,熵指数用于手术患者体位变化时麻醉深度监测更准确。   [关键词] 麻醉深度;脑电双频指数;熵指数;体位因素   中图分类?:R614 文献标识码:A 文章编号:2095-5200(2017)01-033-03   DOI:10.11876/mimt201701013   The effects of postural factor on the Entropy index and the Bispectral index of patients with general anesthesia ZHONG Yanting1,WU Lun2,ZHU Xiaobing2,XIA Ying2. (1.Medical Department of Graduate school of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medine,Guangzhou 510000 Guangdong,China; 2. Department of Anesthesiology, Zhongshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhongshan 528400, China)   [Abstract] Objective: To evaluated the accuracy of Entropy index and Bispectral index when they were used for monitoring the depth of anesthesia of patients with different positions. Methods: 120 cases were enrolled in this study. Anesthsia was induced with propofol-remifentanil given by target controlled infusion. After maintaining steady state target controlled concentration for 10minutes, the patient position was then resetted to horizontal position, head-down position, horizontal position and head-up position. Each kind of positon was keeped 15min, the datas were recorded at 5min interals for 3 readings. Results: The values of BIS and SE of head-down position are much higher than the horizontal position, these stepwise difference in RE values are unsignificant. The values of BIS and SE of head-up position are much lower than the horizontal position(P0.05), these stepwise difference in RE values are unsignificant. Compared with the head-down position,the values of BIS and SE of head-up position are

文档评论(0)

heroliuguan + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:8073070133000003

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档