- 1、本文档共50页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
EVIDENCE OUTLINE - NYU School of Law:证据概述-哥伦比亚大学法学院
EVIDENCE OUTLINE
Prof. Stephen Gillers
Fall 2006
1 ? INTRODUCTION
Trial Context
types of evidence at trial
witnesses
real evidence – something tangible related to the case
demonstrative evidence – not part of the story, but lawyer wishes to show the jury something to demonstrate something about the case (e.g., experiment; picture of intersection)
competing stories at trial – two ways stories can compete
factual differences
differences in inferences drawn from the same facts
Policy Overview [values that the evidence rules protect]
accuracy
rationality – does evidence have a rational relationship to the case?
reliability – is the evidence credible?
efficiency – see FRE 403
fairness – rules should be party-neutral
but note: some rules exclude evidence to one party’s advantage (e.g., evidence that Δ fixed the steps after the accident excluded, b/c we want to encourage Δs to make steps safer) (e.g., Confrontation Clause, guarantees rt of accused in a criminal trial to confront witnesses brought against him)
danger of misuse of information
one solution: limiting instructions
but sometimes we’re so skeptical of jury’s willingness/ability to follow limiting instructions, and the potential harm from the evidence is so grave as to outweigh the modest benefits, so we exclude the evidence
protecting rt to jury trial
part of the 6th A rt to a jury trial is the rt to an effective jury – jury must be able to do more than just what the judge says; so judge must protect jury prerogative to view evidence and draw conclusions
2 ? RELEVANCE
Logical Relevance
as defined in the Rules
FRE 401 – relevant evidence is evidence having any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence
“any tendency” – sets a very low bar
“of consequence to the determination of the action” – incorporates the major premise, relational aspect of relevance
elements of action lay out the g
您可能关注的文档
- (五上)《稻草人》练习题(陈丽).doc
- (三年级起点)英语四年级上册教师用书.doc
- (新版)苏教版小学数学一年级上册课件《认识6---9 练习》.ppt
- (毕业论文)设计年产250万吨1700热带连轧车间(可编辑).doc
- (机密)芦荻哨村项目策划书.doc
- (精)ppt02水文地质调查测绘.ppt
- (精)低年资护士的能力培养85286.ppt
- (火龙果)降低企业生产成本与消除浪费控制.ppt
- ...优秀教学案例评选《地震中的父与子》教学设计.doc
- ...关于东阳市六石高中网络设备及教学楼综合布线系统、广播系统、....doc
- 重庆市两江新区2025届中考历史模拟试题含解析.doc
- 2025届山西省晋南地区中考生物模拟预测题含解析.doc
- 山东省临沂市沂水县2025届中考历史模试卷含解析.doc
- 浙江省杭州市周浦中学2025届中考生物模拟预测题含解析.doc
- 江苏省盐城射阳县联考2025届中考五模历史试题含解析.doc
- 2025届江苏省南师附中集团达标名校十校联考最后历史试题含解析.doc
- 甘肃泾川县2025届中考历史押题试卷含解析.doc
- 山东省潍坊市寒亭区市级名校2025届中考一模化学试题含解析.doc
- 2025届辽宁省葫芦岛市名校中考历史押题卷含解析.doc
- 2025届四川省师大一中学中考历史对点突破模拟试卷含解析.doc
文档评论(0)