- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
从语法角度浅析科技英语中的歧义现象_英语论文
从语法角度浅析科技英语中的歧义现象_英语论文
论文主要从语法角度研究科技英语中的歧义现象。以中科院科技期刊获取平台(CAS-OAJ)上10年6月到10年9月刊登的50篇英文科技论文为语料,在其中寻找语言的歧义性现象,并筛选出由语法原因产生的歧义例句,同时将对这些歧义现象从语法角度语法归为否定歧义,修辞语与中心词歧义,副词歧义,先行词歧义,省略歧义,并提出了从调整语序,改写句子,补充省略部分等方法来避免和消除歧义,以期对人们的日常交流和国际间技术合作有所借鉴意义。6634
关键词科技英语语法歧义现象
外 文 摘 要
TitleSyntactical Analysis of the Ambiguity in Technical English
Abstract
In this paper, we mainly make some syntactical analysis of the ambiguity in technical English. 50 sheets of scientific paper in English from June 2010 to September 2010 on the Chinese Academy of Sciences Science and technology periodical acquisition platform (CAS-OAJ) are taken as the corpus. All the ambiguous examples are selected from the corpus,and from which syntactical ambiguity are studies further. Syntactically, the ambiguity will be classified into negative ambiguity, adverb ambiguity, antecedent ambiguity, and ellipsis ambiguity. Moreover, it is aimed at exploring ways to avoid and eliminate the ambiguity, including adjusting the order of the words, rewriting the sentence, making up the omitted parts. This paper can provide referential significance to people#39;s daily communication and international technical cooperation.
Keywordstechnical EnglishsyntaxambiguityTable of Contents
1Introduction1
Technical English has the main grammatical features of a lot of application ofpassive voices ,nouns or noun phrases, non-finite verb phrases, uses of ldquo;itrdquo; to replace the real subject, and long and complex sentences.(Niu Manshan 2010 http//:/view/2153883.htm)
1.2 Research design
Methodologically speaking, 50 sheets of English scientific paper from June 2010 to September 2010 on the Chinese Academy of Sciences Science and technology periodical acquisition platform (CAS-OAJ) are taken as the corpus. All the ambiguity phenomena are selected from the corpus and are analyzed on syntactical level. More than 80 examples are collected and classified into five types of ambiguity, namely, negative sentence with ldquo;notrdquo;, adje
文档评论(0)