中国房价收入比真的不是衡量地产泡沫的标准（Chinas real estate income ratio is not really a measure of the real estate bubble standards）.docVIP

中国房价收入比真的不是衡量地产泡沫的标准（Chinas real estate income ratio is not really a measure of the real estate bubble standards） In recent years, some city housing prices rose rapidly, is significantly higher than average income, far from the majority of the population of working-class purchasing power, the price has become the focus of public concern hot social problems, has become the focus of many contradictions in todays society and the intersection. In order to solve the housing problems of the people, resolve social conflicts, from the central to local governments are now taking various measures such as the Ministry of Construction Minister Wang Guangtao in the national construction work conference held recently on 2005 clearly pointed out, will increase the low-cost ordinary commodity housing, affordable housing construction. Such as Beijing, Shanghai, Xian, Hangzhou and other cities are also taking measures to increase low-cost commodity housing, affordable housing and low-cost housing supply...... However, in this context, the day before, there is a real estate industry authority has published an article pointed out that the ratio is not to measure the real estate bubble standard real income. After the publication of this article, it immediately aroused the concern and concern of many people. People in particular will focus on the discussion and the final formulation of the article, hope that we work together to study the problem, to gradually unify the understanding, each one airs his own views, until finally the necessary organizational procedures, define the standard uniform foam state. As the real estate industry is directly related to the countrys financial security, therefore, the real estate income ratio is not a measure of the real estate bubble standard problem, it is really a matter of priority. For this reason, I feel that even though I have offended authority, it is still necessary for me to discuss my views and views here. Of course, the improper place, also