正确认识 科学防癌（Correct understanding of scientific cancer prevention）.docVIP

正确认识 科学防癌（Correct understanding of scientific cancer prevention） Correct understanding of scientific prevention of cancer (health lecture hall) I think cancer is just a distant legend, and there are more and more cancer patients around, many people feel. April 15th - 20 day is 2013 cancer prevention week, WHO pointed out in the report, 1/3 1/3 can prevent cancer, through early detection, early diagnosis and early treatment, and ultimately cure 1/3, through appropriate treatment, can prolong life and improve the quality of life. Authoritative experts are: as long as the correct understanding, scientific prevention and treatment, cancer is not so terrible. The highest incidence of lung cancer is lung cancer At present, the incidence of lung cancer is becoming more and more serious. According to the day before the release of the 2012 national cancer registry annual report data show that the incidence rate of malignant tumor was highest in lung cancer, lung cancer ranks first in male cancer incidence, ranking second in women. Since the 50s of last century, more and more research evidence has shown that smoking is closely related to lung cancer in the world. Of the currently diagnosed and dying lung cancer patients, 87% are related to smoking, including passive smoking. There are more than 4000 kinds of harmful substances in tobacco, of which there are 69 kinds of cancer related, these harmful carcinogens after a long time on the bronchial mucosa of the impact and stimulation, eventually leading to bronchial epithelial carcinogenesis. Long term smoking presents a long, lagging process of carcinogenesis and is likely to truly enjoy the health risks of smoking to smokers over the next 30, 40 or 50 years. There are a number of countries, including clinical research Chinese factors involved in the discovery, tobacco types, age to start smoking, duration of smoking, daily smoking amount, on the occurrence and development of lung cancer have a constant dose effect relationship