网站大量收购独家精品文档,联系QQ:2885784924

gmat逻辑解题lawyer语录(GMAT logic problem solving lawyer Quotes).doc

gmat逻辑解题lawyer语录(GMAT logic problem solving lawyer Quotes).doc

  1. 1、本文档共15页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
gmat逻辑解题lawyer语录(GMAT logic problem solving lawyer Quotes)

gmat逻辑解题lawyer语录(GMAT logic problem solving lawyer Quotes) [method of actual combat] GMAT logic solution method by lawyer Hidden articles: This article lawyer, detailed examination taken steps and how to read the original, including what type, GMAT logic and characteristics of various types and specific solutions, in actual combat is very useful. Its classification with XDF is, to some extent, closer to ETSs intention to issue questions, providing us with a different way of summarizing categories. Suggest that you read in detail, repeated experience, and strive for better results in actual combat. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Someone once asked, when the exam is to do according to the usual analysis problem of thinking, the answer is NO, time is not allowed, the exam questions largely by feeling, this feeling mainly depends on the usual analysis topic ideas form. To this end, the following discussion of this feeling, analysis of the examination is actually how to do it. Problem solving procedure One. Look at the problem The problem is divided into: MUST BE TRUE (including SUPPORT THE FOLLOWING POINT (/MIAN) IN BLANK /WEAKEN/SUPPORT/JUSTIFY THE FILL) CONCLUSION/ASSUMPTION/RESOLVE THE PARADOX/METHOD OF REASONING (ROLE) /FLAW IN THE REASONING/PARALLEL REASONING/EVALUATION THE ARGUMENT/CANNOT BE TRUE /POINT AT (including WEAKEN option) ISSUE/PRINCIPLE Two. Analysis of the original text 1., the original text has the conclusion: distinguish the premise, the counter premise, the additional premise, the intermediate conclusion and the summary theory, especially the direct premise of the conclusion. The formation of a reasoning structure in the brain, for example (direct premise). Pay attention to the particularity and the specificity of the conclusion 2., the original text did not conclude: there are three main categories, MUST, BE, TRUE/CANNOT, BE, TRUE/RESOLVE, THE, DESCREPANCY. Combine the first two kinds and combine th

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

f8r9t5c + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:8000054077000003

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档