好文章，坏文章-Good Writing, Bad Writing -.docVIP

好文章，坏文章-Good Writing, Bad Writing ? Gd riting, Bad riting ? Despite the dern desire t be eas and asual, Aerians fr tie t tie give thught t the language the use, t graar, vabular,and ffiial languages And, as n ther issues, the divide int t parties The larger, hih inludes everbd fr the plain peple t the prfessinal riter, taes fr granted that there is a right a t use rds and nstrut sentenes and an rng as The right a is believed t be learer,sipler, re lgial, and hene re liel t prevent errr and nfusin Gd riting is easier t read; it ffers a pleasant binatin f sund and sense Against this arit vie is the dtrine f an ppsing inrit, h ae up fr their sall nuber b their great learning and their plae f authrit in the shl sste and the rld f shlarship The are the prfessinal linguists,h den that there is suh a thing as rretness The language, the sa, is hat anbd and everbd speasHene there ust be n interferene ith hat the regard as a prdut f nature The denune all attepts at guiding hie ithin the prfessin f linguists there are, f urse,fighting fatins, but, n this neptin f language as a natural grth ith hih it is riinal t interfere, the are at ne In their arguents ne finds appeals t feelings f sial equalit (all rds and frs are equall gd) and individual freed These beliefs further suggest that the desire fr rretness, the ver idea f better r rse in speeh, is hat is left ver fr nble and ties T the linguists, hange is the nl rule t be beed The nsider it t be equal ith life and ause their ritis f being l-reverses, eneies f freed, enaes tlife 好文章，坏文章? 尽管现代社会要求简单、随意，美国人却时不时地对他们用的语言、语法、词汇和官方语言表示关注。而且，像在其他问题上一样，他们·分为两派。多数派，包括从一般百姓到专业作家的所有人，都理所当然地认为有一种正确的遣词造句的方式，也存在很多错误的方式。人们相信正确的方式是使文章比较清楚、简单、更有逻辑性，进而更有可能避免错误和含混不清。好文章容易读；它为读者提供了声音和意义的美妙结合。 与这种占大多数的观点相对的是持反对意见的少数派的主张，他们渊博的学识以及在教育界和学术界的权威地位弥补了人数少的劣势。他们是专业的语言学家，他们否 认有正确的写作方式这回事。他们说任何人或者说每个人说的都是语言，所以我们不应该人为地修改他们认为是自然的产物。他们痛斥所有试图选择正确写作指导的做法。 在语言学家内部当然也有相互斗争的派别，但是在“语言是自然发展的，干涉即是犯 罪”这一点上，他们的观点是一致的。在他们的论点中，人们可以发现社会公平(所有词语和形式都是一样的好)和个人自由的感情趋向。这些主张还进一步暗示：