刍议刑法上的假想避险过当（On the hypothesis of avoiding danger in criminal law）.docVIP

下载本文档

1
0
约1.4万字
约 10页
2017-09-03 发布于河南
举报
版权申诉

刍议刑法上的假想避险过当（On the hypothesis of avoiding danger in criminal law）.doc

1、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

刍议刑法上的假想避险过当（On the hypothesis of avoiding danger in criminal law）

刍议刑法上的假想避险过当（On the hypothesis of avoiding danger in criminal law） On the hypothesis of avoiding danger in criminal law Author: Xu Minli release time: 2011-08-10 09:24:11 Imaginary refuge when, although not refers to the happening of dangerous or urgent danger, but the behavior of people mistakenly thought to exist, and the implementation of risk aversion, at the same time, even if this danger does exist, its implementation of the act is more than necessary limits, should not cause some damage. This is actually the case of imaginary hedging and hedging. There are few scholars who mention this problem in our country. The author will try to discuss the proposition that imaginary danger is excessive. We hope that we can clarify one or two. I. characteristics of imaginary hedging There are three important characteristics of hypothetical hedging: First, the urgent danger does not exist, and the perpetrator mistakenly believe that the existence of this is the premise of the assumption that the hedge is too soon; Two, the behavior is based on the intention of hedging, the implementation of hedging behavior, if there is no hedging intention, the behavior will not have the property of hedging, the assumption that the hedge when too can not be established; The three is hedging behavior more than necessary limits, it refers to the risk even if the behavior people mistakenly think exist, from the need to avoid the risk, the hedging behavior is more than necessary limits. Although there are some similarities between hypothetical hedging and past hedging and hedging, there are important differences between them. First of all, and the imaginary necessity is different, when the imaginary necessity exists not only narrow imaginary necessity phenomenon, but also existed when the problem is the misconception that the danger even exists objectively, the implementation of the hedge behavior over the hedge of the limits of necessity, should not have resulted in damage. But there is no su