analysis- cyberspace game countermeasures under new normal（分析-网络游戏新常态下的对策）.docVIP

下载本文档

0
0
约2.49万字
约 23页
2017-09-05 发布于浙江
举报
版权申诉

analysis- cyberspace game countermeasures under new normal（分析-网络游戏新常态下的对策）.doc

1、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

analysis- cyberspace game countermeasures under new normal（分析-网络游戏新常态下的对策）

Analysis: Cyberspace Game countermeasures under new normal (Free paper Download Center News) Case I: Transfer on IANA regulatory authority From March 14, 2013 US Department of Commerce announced the transfer of IANA Communication Technologies Authority permission began almost a year’s time. The reason for this program triggered concern is related to the country’s cyberspace IANA procedural matters most symbolic resources is the root zone server, the root zone profile and a global network of top-level domain name registration space management mechanism and substantive matters. In this process, you’ll find them in cyberspace order, different preferences schemes in a fierce competition. The US government’s preference for pure privatization solution, pure privatization solution requires a multi-stakeholder model, NGO, individuals, corporations constitute non-stakeholder entity under the jurisdiction of critical resources. There is a trap, often overlooked, if managed according to the pure privatization program, what kind of results will appear. The result is individual, American NGO and US companies in the United States will be among the multi-stakeholder, in the foreseeable future to maintain an overwhelming advantage. All these American individualism, American companies, American NGO all accepted the de facto jurisdiction of the United States Government. So the United States the formal jurisdiction to pay out. The second is the transfer of jurisdiction to consider solutions. If this program to the inter-governmental international organization to manage it, the American government can interrupt the transfer process. In this case, unless the way the conflict between sovereign states, otherwise there is no way mandatory deprivation. The third is a hybrid scheme. The extent to allow IANA into a new independent organization, who carry out supervision and so on. Case II: Monitoring and theft US game in cyberspace, the core is whether China will