Elsevier Journal提交过程.ppt

  1. 1、本文档共41页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
Elsevier Journal提交过程

Reference,Tables,Figures 参考文献是否准确 参考文献的数量 参考文献著录格式,信息是否完整 图表数量、质量、位置、格式 Guide for authors! 文题 作者 摘要 关键词 正文 (IMRAD) Introduction Methods Results And Discussion (Conclusions) 致谢 参考文献 补充材料(Supporting material) 便于编辑与读者查阅! (informative, attractive, effective) 各司其职 总结 反复阅读“Guide for Authors”! 审稿后的修改: 绝好的学习机会! 要珍惜这个直接与同行探讨问题的机会。对于审稿意见要给予充分的回应。 在每一条审稿意见下面写出您的看法或回应。不要漏掉任何一条。特别注明已经做出的修改(如果有的话)。标明页码与序号。常见的问题 – 探讨了许多问题,但是最终也没说清到底做了哪些修改。 对于您接受的意见给以专业的回应。对于您不接受的,要有理有据地说明你不赞同的理由,力图说服对方,同时要保持应有的尊重和礼貌。 一个例子 “… Reviewer’s Comments: It would also be good to acknowledge that geographic routing as you describe it is not a complete routing solution for wireless networks, except for applications that address a region rather than a particular node. Routing between nodes requires further machinery, which detracts from the benefits of geographic routing, and which I dont believe you have made practical. Author’s reply: We agree and will add an appropriate caveat. Note that for data-centric storage (name-based exact-match and range queries for sensed events), the storage and query processing mechanisms natively address packets geographically--without a node-to-location database. … Reviewer’s Comments: The footnotes are driving me crazy! Author’s reply: Well strive to remove some of them. …” – Dr. Ramesh Govindan, professor, Computer Science Department, University of Southern California /~ramesh/writings/files/NSDI_response.txt 一个提出反对意见的例子 Reviewer #4 clearly didnt read my paper carefully enough. Either that or this reviewer doesnt know anything about the field! How should I respond during the rebuttal period? Please dont say: If reviewer #4 had just taken the time to read my paper carefully, she would have realized that our algorithm was rotation invariant. Instead say: Unfortunately, Section #4 must not have been as clear as we had hoped because Reviewer #4 didnt understand that our algorithm was rotation invariant and

文档评论(0)

jgx3536 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:6111134150000003

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档