基于ANCT与Adaline两种自适应谐波电流检测模型的分析.pdfVIP

第41 卷 第16 期 电力系统保护与控制 Vol.41 No.16 2013 年8 月16 日 Power System Protection and Control Aug.16, 2013 基于ANCT 和Adaline 两种自适应谐波电流检测模型的分析 喻 翌，赵海全，何正友 (西南交通大学电气工程学院，四川 成都 610031) 摘要：介绍了两种自适应谐波电流检测模型的基本原理，即基于自适应噪声对消技术（ANCT ）的谐波电流检测模型和基于 Adaline 的自适应谐波电流检测模型，并分析了两种模型在相同自适应算法的条件下的检测性能，缺陷和适用范围，以及不 同自适应算法对相同模型的检测性能的影响。分析结果表明：在相同算法条件下，两种模型的收敛速度一致，后者的稳态误 差小（理论上可以为 0）但计算量大，前者只适用于信噪比很大的情况下并且其检测结果主要作为有源电力滤波器（APF ） 的参考信号，而后者的检测结果还有其他用途（如谐波分析，保护和控制等）；同时，不同的自适应算法对同一模型检测性 能的影响由算法本身决定。数值仿真验证了该理论分析的正确性。 关键词：谐波检测；自适应算法；自适应噪声对消技术；Adaline Analysis of the two adaptive harmonic current detection models based on ANCT and Adaline YU Yi, ZHAO Hai-quan, HE Zheng-you (School of Electrical Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China) Abstract: This paper first introduces the basic principle of two kinds of adaptive harmonic current detection models, which are based on adaptive noise cancellation technology (ANCT) and Adaline, respectively. The detection performance, defects and the scope of application of the two models under the condition of the same adaptive algorithm are analyzed, and the impact on the detection performance of different adaptive algorithms with respect to the same model is also provided. Analysis results show that under the conditions of the same algorithm, the convergence rate of the two models is consistent, and the steady state error of the latter is small (theoretical value may be 0) but computationally intensive, the former is only applicable to the case of the high SNR, the detection results of the former is only used as reference signal of the active power filter (APF) while the latter has other applications (e.g., harmonic analysi