- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
对绑架罪和抢劫罪界限的探析-法律学专业毕业论文
Abstract
Because the offense of robbery and kidnapping crime which take extorts
the belongings as the goal, have many similarities. In addition to the social
reality and the perpetrator behavior way complexity , the cause kidnapping
crime which take extorts the belongings as the goal and the offense of robbery
pesters in together in many time , Since it has been puzzles the judicial
practical realm the question, It is also the question which academic theorists
often dispute , discussion. This article obtains from a piece of case,
simultaneously draws support other cases, through the case analysis reports
form, so as to find out kidnapped the crime and the offense of robbery
difference and relation ,as well as I carry on the research analysis to
differentiate the twos viewpoint of theorists in the practice, and proposed my
viewpoint.
This article altogether is divided three major parts, approximately 15,000
characters.
First part: Case fact and dispute focal point. It includes specifically: (1)
main points of a case and case’s basic situation.(2) Peoples Court of DaYing
County of Sichuan Province has heared the facts of the case about Tang Mou
(3) both the accusant and the defense counsel argue focus. the accusant
accuse Tang Mou and so on five defendants to commit the kidnapping crime,
however Tang Mou debates his behavior are the illegal detention crime, the
other four defendants and attorney debate the four defendants constitute the
offense of robbery, but non-kidnapping crime. (4) Peoples court of DaYing
County,Sichuan Province decides legally detailed reason.(5) Peoples court
decides
您可能关注的文档
- 对我国饲养动物致人损害责任相关立法的思考-法律学(法学)专业毕业论文.pdf
- 对抗生素滥用问题的立法分析-宪法学与行政法学专业毕业论文.pdf
- 对新时期中学德育改革的思考-思想政治教育专业毕业论文.pdf
- 对新古典舞流派“昆舞”形成与存在的价值取向的探索-舞蹈学专业毕业论文.pdf
- 对日学生被动句偏误分析-汉语国际教育专业毕业论文.pdf
- 对日软件工程日语口译实践报告-日语口译专业毕业论文.pdf
- 对毒品犯罪案件中诱惑侦查手段的思考-刑事诉讼法专业毕业论文.pdf
- 对死亡意识的美学审视-文艺学专业毕业论文.pdf
- 对比传统即兴伴奏与流行键盘即兴伴奏后的几点思考-音乐学专业毕业论文.pdf
- 对毕加索绘画和言论的思索-美术学专业毕业论文.pdf
- 对维米尔绘画中暗箱应用的探究-美术学专业毕业论文.pdf
- 对蒙学生的汉语语音教学分析-中国语言文学;语言学及应用语言学专业毕业论文.pdf
- 对角占优矩阵、块对角占优矩阵及其相关特殊矩阵类的一些研究-应用数学专业毕业论文.pdf
- 对话——我看当代艺术-美术(版画)专业毕业论文.pdf
- 对调控房价的“新国八条”的评析-法律专业毕业论文.pdf
- 对资源性资产几个会计问题的探讨-会计学专业毕业论文.pdf
- 对近年来《中国国家地理》杂志策划与设计的思考-设计艺术(视觉传达方向).专业毕业论文.pdf
- 对韩一对一汉语教学实践分析-汉语国际教育专业毕业论文.pdf
- 对高中音乐特长生考前声乐辅导若干意见-学科教学专业毕业论文.pdf
- 对颜真卿行草书风格渊源与流布的思考-美术专业毕业论文.pdf
文档评论(0)