【精选】360绩效考核英文论文.pdf

2004 APDS SPRING MEETING: PART 2 The 360-degree Evaluation: Increased Work With Little Return? John A. Weigelt, MD,* Karen J. Brasel, MD,* Dawn Bragg, MD, † and Deborah Simpson, PhD† Departments of *Surgery and †Educational Affairs, The Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin OBJECTIVE: To test a 360-degree resident evaluation tool on KEY WORDS: 360-degree evaluation, feedback, resident ed- our trauma/critical care services to determine if multiple raters ucation, competency yielded equivalent information compared with traditional fac- ulty evaluations. INTRODUCTION DESIGN: Prospective evaluation. PARTICIPANTS: Residents, nurses, faculty, and staff at an The ACGME Outcome Project is a long-term initiative that academic medical center. was designed to increase the emphasis on educational outcomes in residency programs.1 A component of the Outcome Project METHODS: The evaluation tool was developed based on ex- is to change the emphasis of medical education assessment from tensive qualitative analysis of 13 major medical specialties’ Res- structure and process measures to outcome measures. In 1999, idency Review Committee (RRC) criteria relative to the this transition focused educational efforts on 6 general compe- ACGME competencies and then revised with content specific tencies.2 These 6 are patient care, medical knowledge, profes- to surgery. The evaluation contained 19 items divided into sionalism, interpersonal and communication skills, practice- ACGME competency areas. Each item was scored on a 1 to 9 based learning, and systems-based practice. Likert scale: 1 not