- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
ISEL (IRESSA Survival Evaluation in Lung cancer), a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicentre, Phase III trial, was designed to investigate the effect on survival of gefitinib 250 mg/day plus best supportive care (BSC) in patients with NSCLC who were refractory to, or intolerant of, their most recent chemotherapy regimen.1 The primary endpoint of ISEL was survival in the overall and adenocarcinoma patient populations. Secondary endpoints included time to treatment failure (TTF), ORR, QoL and symptom improvement and safety. Eligible patients were 18 years old, had received 1 or 2 prior therapies for NSCLC, and were refractory to or intolerant of their most recent chemotherapy regimen. Patients were stratified initially according to tumour histology, sex, smoking history, number of prior chemotherapy regimens, reason for failure of prior chemotherapy and performance status (PS). Prior to unblinding, the following additional patient subgroups were added to the statistically rigorous subgroup analysis: prior docetaxel treatment; age at randomisation; time from diagnosis to treatment; racial origin; and best response to prior chemotherapy. Patients were randomised in a 2:1 ratio to receive gefitinib or placebo, and received BSC according to local practice. At a median follow-up of 7.2 months (range 3-15 months), 976 deaths had occurred in the ISEL trial and the total mortality rate was 58%. In the overall population the improvement in survival with IRESSA did not reach statistical significance compared with placebo (Log-rank hazard ratio [HR] 0.89; 95% [CI] 0.77, 1.02; p=0.087).1 However, a supportive Cox proportional hazards analysis suggested statistical significance in favour of IRESSA (HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.76, 0.99; p=0.030). Median survival in the overall population was 5.6 months for IRESSA compared with 5.1 months for placebo.1 Estimated 1-year survival rates for IRESSA and placebo were 27% and 21%, respectively, in the overall po
您可能关注的文档
最近下载
- 镇痛治疗规范.docx VIP
- 数字文化与娱乐:2025年动漫IP衍生品市场洞察报告.docx
- 护理安全管理在新生儿病房的应用课件教学教材演示幻灯片.pptx VIP
- 2025至2030中国动物园行业产业运行态势及投资规划深度研究报告.docx
- NB-T 47047-2015 承压设备用镍及镍合金无缝管.pdf VIP
- 气道净化护理(2024年中华护理学会团体标准).pptx VIP
- 高中数学函数的单调性教学设计比赛一等奖.doc VIP
- 《电子商务概论》(附微课 第5版)课件 第7、8章 新媒体运营、 电子商务安全.pdf
- 深圳市育才教育团育才三中语文新初一分班试卷含答案.doc VIP
- 测绘地形图图技术总结.doc VIP
文档评论(0)