- 1、本文档共10页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
Cases at glance,ACCA F4 案例部分总结
Ratio Decidendi Case Facts Held
An advertisement with element of reward is a public offer.
Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co [1893]
An advert placed for smoke balls to prevent influenza. offered to pay £100 if anyone contracted influenza after using the ball. Deposited £1,000 with the Alliance Bank to show their sincerity in the matter. The plaintiff bought one of the balls but contracted influenza
she was entitled to recover as
(a) The deposit of money showed an intention to be bound, therefore the advert was an offer;
(b) It was possible to make an offer to the world at large, which is accepted by anyone who buys a smoke-ball;
(c) The offer of protection would cover the period of use; and
(d) The buying and using of the smoke-ball amounted to acceptance.
Acceptance of offer has to be communicated.
R v Clarke [1927]
The Government offered a reward for information leading to the arrest of certain murderers and a pardon to an accomplice who gave the information. Clarke saw the proclamation. He gave information which led to the conviction of the murderers. He admitted that his only object in doing so was to clear himself of a charge of murder and that he had no intention of claiming the reward at that time. He sued the Crown for the reward
The court dismissed the case. There cannot be assent without knowledge of the offer; and ignorance of the offer is the same thing whether it is due to never hearing of it or forgetting it after hearing.
Revocation has to be communicated.
Byrne V Leon Van [1880]
An offer made on 1st October (In Cardiff). Claimant (in New York) received it on 11th send acceptance at once. In the main time the defendant change his mind and sent a letter of revocation on 8th Oct. Revocation letter reached on 15th Oct.
The revocation was not complete until it had been communicated to the offeree. This was on 15th October. In the main time, however the offer had been accepted. As a result the revocation was ineffective the contrac
文档评论(0)