Sartre存在主义是人道主义读后感.docx

Now that Sartre radical insists there is no god, there is no inherent value and all history and objective factors can affect the individual choice, then, is the inevitable result of isolation for individuals have such a problem: When people are thrown in the world, only the right to choose, if his choice is arbitrary? What makes people to make a value judgment? This problem manifests in Sartre’s response to dump on the same: Since existentialism built on the basis of Descartes cogito, we must face the problem that people how to agree with someone other than the self. But, on the basis of Sartres point of view What we choose is always the better, and nothing can be better for us unless it is better for all. and his negation of fascism, we can easily see that Sartre admitted to a better value which can be approved by anyone, rather than a certain arbitrariness. So we will be very meticulous care about a problem: how to select a specific behavior.Obviously, in the article Sartre answered this question directly: ?When we say that man is responsible for himself，we do not mean that he is responsible only for his own individuality，but that he is responsible for all man. ?Sartre think people should be in the choice to create a self, at the same time create a self-worth, and we also lead to all people. This is similar to Kant’s Self legislation is a common legislation at the same time , However, Sartre borrowed the form of Kants general legislation, do not use of Kant material, so this question has not been answered: according to the subjective choice of the individual behavior, how to achieve the objective requirements for all people agree?Sartre thinks that personal choice is closely related to the others, a person at the same time of choice to face the if everyone to do so, whats uneasy mood as precondition of choice, or it is just self-deception. This link more profound connotation lies in the fact that existence precedes essence proposition for the people in creating th