刑事诉讼双语教学教案.doc

华北煤炭医学院 教 案 ： 法律系 教研室 ： 公法学科 任课教师姓名 ： 费蓬煜 任课教师职称 ： 助教 课程名称 ： 刑事诉讼法学 授课时间 ： 2006-2007学年第学期 Chapter X Rules of Criminal Proove 授课对象 04法本、04冀唐 授课时数 3学时 2006-2007学年上学期 授课地点 北1楼401、402 目的 与要 求 Comprehensive understanding and grasp of criminal evidence rules, and can skillfully employing the English expression of the rules of the name and description of the meaning of the rules. 教学 重点 与难 点 Miranda rules ； Rules prohibiting double jeopardy / of the rules no longer justified； 3.Fruit of the Poisonous Tree Rules； 教学 方法 讲习结合 多媒体课件 教学 步骤 基本理论讲授 案例分析讨论 课上习题 课后思考题 题或 作业 1. Recite the four-sentence Miranda warning 2.How did the media, the bar, and the political circle respond to the Miranda warning? 3.Is there any exception to Miranda warning? What is it, if yes? 4.Define Exclusionary rule 5. Define the fruit of the poisonous tree 6. What is double jeopardy ? The same offense? Criminal Procedure：Rules of Proove Adversary: Both parties develop and present the evidence for their side. accusatorial: 告发的government shoulder the entire burden of proving the defendant’s guilt on every element of the crime without the compelled assistance of the accused or the helping hand of the judgeSearch and seizure Search and seizure: the 4th amendment provides that “the right of the people to be secure in their persons（身上）, houses, papers and effects（财产）, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated and no warrants搜查令 shall be issued, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized. Part Tow: Miranda warnings米兰达规则1963年3月13日，被告米兰达在自己家中被捕，被警察带到警察局，事后警方承认，讯问前未告知其有获得律师帮助的权利。二小时后，米兰达在警察“为什么要干”的讯问下供认了犯罪事实，在讯问笔录上也签了字，据此他被以强奸罪和绑架罪提起诉讼，经法院几次审理都被判有罪，判处监禁50年。米兰达不服，最后上诉到联邦最高法院。当时的首席大法官沃伦经审理认为：警察的讯问违背了美国宪法第五修正案，即任何人不得被迫在刑事案件中自证其罪。所以由此获得的被告承认有罪的供述不能作为定罪的证据，故撤销原判决，立即释放被告。The law of confession (Miranda warnings): the 5th amendment provides that no person “shall be