专利制度是否该被废除一辩稿.docx

感谢主席、评委、观众及对方辩友。Thank you for the chairman , the judges, the audience and the con [k?n] side.明辩题今天我们要讨论的辩题是：专利制度是否应该废除。我方坚持认为专利制度应该废除。Today,we will have a discussion about whether the patent system should be abolished，and we insist that its better to abolish the patant system.破题首先，我将就专利制度这个概念作解释。Firstly,I am going to explain the concept of the patent system. 专利制度是国际上通行的一种利用法律的和经济的手段确认发明人对其发明享有专有权，以保护和促进技术发明的制度。Patent system is a common international system which uses legal and economic means to confirm that the inventor has exclusive right to the invention and protects and promotes the system of technical invention.定标准当我们谈到这个辩题，我们无法否认专利制度在创立之初确实起到了积极的作用，然而专利制度是时代的产物，时代在不断变化，专利制度与时代的契合度也在降低，如今，专利制度已无法极大得鼓励创新，促进社会资源的充分利用，保护消费者的利益。When it comes to the topic,there is no denying that the patent system has played a positive role in the beginning of the establishment.However, the patent system is the product of the times.The times is always changing and the fitness of the patent system and the times is constantly reducing .Nowadays, Patent system has been unable to encourage innovation, promote the full use of social resources and protect the interests of consumers.多方面论述下面我方将从以下三个方面来论述我方观点：And then I will discuss our point of view From these three aspects.第一从鼓励创新角度上，废除专利制度利大于弊。创新主要是对已有创意的叠加，而不是完全的独立突破。然而在过去的时间里，大量的专利授权行为导致我们如今想要在不侵犯某种专利的前提下来构建任何东西已经变得非常困难。想要进行创新，我们就得冒着因此将面临专利诉讼并可能需要作出巨额赔偿的风险。From the aspect of encouraging innovation, abolishing the patent system has more superiority [su:?p??ri??r?ti]. Innovation is mainly the superposition叠加of existing ideas, rather than a completely independent breakthrough.However, A large number of Patent Licensing [la?sns??] Act in the past time makes it almost impossible for us to build anything without infringing [?n?fr?nd?] on a patent.We may have to face patent litigation [?l?t??ge??n] and make a huge amount of compensation if we want to innovate.第二从促进社会资源的充分利用角度上，废除专利制度利大于弊。研究发现40%-80%的专利其专利权人从来没有运用或者许可，这些专利的创造性和应用价值不足，甚至不乏垃圾专利，然而