腰椎间盘突出症椎间孔镜治疗后复发的术式选择及-第三军医大学学报.docVIP

腰椎间盘突出症椎间孔镜治疗后复发的术式选择及-第三军医大学学报.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
腰椎间盘突出症椎间孔镜治疗后复发的术式选择及-第三军医大学学报

腰椎间盘突出症椎间孔镜治疗后复发病例的 微创术式选择及临床应用 上官磊,? 宁广智,?李长青,? 周跃 第三军医大学附属新桥医院骨科 【摘要】 目的: 评价腰椎间盘突出症患者椎间孔镜治疗后突出复发的微创翻修术式,并评估其临床疗效。方法:共3例椎间孔镜治疗后腰椎间盘突出复发患者, 男0例,女3例,平均50.8岁。其中0例患者获得随访(随访率94.1%),随访时间平均随访.9月。临床患者被分为三组:再次行椎间孔镜下髓核摘除组(20例)、后路行椎间盘镜下髓核摘除术组(1例)和经Quadrant通道下TLIF组(1例)。疗效评定按照目测视觉类比评分法(VAS评分))、Nakai分级。结果: 三组患者术后VAS显著降低,手术前后有显著(p<0.05),三组之间比较无差异(p>0.05)。根据Nakai分级;椎间孔镜组优良率% ,椎间盘镜组优良率%,经Quadrant通道下TLIF组优良率9.3%。虽然三组优良率间比较无统计学意义(p>0.05),但组的手术时间、术中出血量、术后下床时间都显著低于组。结论 : 椎间孔镜下行腰椎间盘突出复发翻修术非常有效和安全,仍然是腰椎间盘突出复发的首选术式。【】 strategies and options for recurrent lumbar disc herniation after the treatment of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy. SHANGGUAN Lei, NING Guang-zhi, LI Chang-qing, ZHOU Yue. Department of Orthopaedics, Xinqiao Hospital, the Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400037, China Corresponding author:ZHOU YueEmail:Happyzhou@【Abstract】 Objective To evaluate the results of minimally invasive revision surgery for recurrent disc herniation. Methods: A total of 53 patients who had undergone revision surgery for recurrent disc herniation after the treatment of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy has been surveyed to assess their clinical outcome. The 50 patients who had been followed were divided into three groups: 20 cases received percutaneous endoscopic lumbar l discectomy alone, 18 cases received microendoscopic discectomy alone and 15 cases received microendoscopic discectomy with interbody fusion. With an average follow-up of 16.9 months after revision surgery. Clinical symptoms were assessed based on the VAS score、ODI index and Nakai criteria. All medical and surgical records were examined and analyzed, including intraoperative blood loss, length of surgery, and postsurgery hospital stay et al. Results: The statistical difference in the postoperative VAS score and ODI index compared with that of preoperative was significant(P0.05). Clinical outcomes were excellent or good in 85% of patients undergoing percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy alone, in 88

文档评论(0)

laolao123 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档