HFSS仿真_p43.pptVIP

High Frequency Structural Simulator (HFSS)介紹ANSYS, Inc. 王策玄 Email, FB: cfh120@20141020修改 Basics of Electromagnetic Solvers EM Tools/Terms preliminaries Quasi-static/Full wave/2D/2.5D/3D…what does this mean really and how do they affect my needs? Quasi-static/Full-wave → Depends how Maxwell’s equations are being solved:(E,H) or (E), (H) 2D/2.5D/3D → Depends on what type of structures it can be applied: planar/via/arbitrary 3D FEM/BEM- Depends on what they are “natively” solving: (I,V) or (E,H) Full-wave solver: Solves the coupled E- and H-field Maxwell’s equations Makes no assumptions on field relationships Captures high-frequency effects such as electromagnetic coupling, resonance, radiation, dispersion etc. Increased memory/time requirements compared to QS solution Quasi-static solver: Neglect displacement current Electrical fields remain static outside conductors, (G, C is obtained) Magnetic fields retain frequency dependency inside conductors so that the skin effect can be accounted for properly (R, L is obtained) E and H can be solved independently leading to speed and capacity Static RLCk models for electrical small (less than lambda/10) structures. Typically good for package/PCB self-mutual parasitic SPICE model extraction below GHz range EM Tools/Terms preliminaries 2D solver: Solves problems where only planar arbitrary shapes are present in a number of metal layers separated by dielectric 2.5D solver Typically solves problems where there are arbitrary shapes in a number of metal layers which are separated by layers of dielectric and may be connected by vertical vias 3D solver Can model any arbitrary shapes/structures Choice of tool has to be based on Modeling needs Capacity needs of the model Accuracy needs of the model Tradeoff decision based on tool availability, resources etc. Different Types of EM Solvers 常見的EM模擬軟體 CST是基於FDTD電磁場求解演算法的模擬器,適合模擬寬頻頻譜結果,因為只需要輸入一個時域脈衝就可以覆蓋寬頻帶 HFSS是基於FEM(有限元法)電磁場求解演算法的模擬器,適合模擬三維複雜結果 ADS內含momentum(基於第三種經典演算法－矩量法),是一種