腹腔镜下全子宫切除与腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除的比较.pdfVIP

·258· 临床论著· 腹腔镜下全子宫切除与腹腔镜辅助阴式 子宫切除的比较 张海清李斌① (北京首都国际机场医院妇科，北京 100621) 目的 对比分析腹腔镜全子宫切除术(total 【摘要】 laparoscopic 方法 (1aparoscopic．assistedvaginalhysterectomy，LAVH)的临床价值。 和LAVH的手术时间、出血量、排气时间、住院时间、子宫重量及术后病率、泌尿系损伤、肠管损伤、血管损伤等并发症。 结果 生。 结论TLH和LAVH均是安全可行的。 【关键词】 腹腔镜下全子宫切除术； 腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术 中图分类号：R713．4+2 文献标识：A 文章编号：1009—6604(2013)03—0258—04 betweenTotal and HysterectomyLaparoscopic-assitedVaginalHysterctomyZhangHaiqing’．“ Comparison Laparoscopic International Bin．’DepartmentofGynecology，BeijingCapital AirportHospital，Be乒ng100621，China To the oftotal efficacy hysterectomy(TLH)andlaparoscopic—assistedvaginal 【Abstract】Objectiveanalyze laparoscopic MethodsA wascarriedoutin1034casesofTLHorLAVHin analysis BeijingCapital hysterectomy(LAVH)．retrospective International and Anzhen from 2007to 201 of AirportHospitalBeijing HospitalJanuary January2，inrespectoperationtime， blood timeof ofremoved intraoperativeloss，recoverygastrointestinalfunction，hospitalstay，weight uterus，andpostoperative and ResultsThe were inallthe1034cases．No difference completed significant morbiditycomplications． laparoscopicprocedures in wasobserved morbidity operationtime[(80．4±19．2)minvs．(80．2±17．8)min，t=0．166，P=0．868]andpostoperative the