- 1、本文档共77页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
强化学习PPT
蒙特卡罗控制 How to select Policies: (Similar to policy evaluation) MC policy iteration: Policy evaluation using MC methods followed by policy improvement Policy improvement step: greedify with respect to value (or action-value) function 时序差分学习 Temporal-Difference target: the actual return after time t target: an estimate of the return 时序差分学习 (TD) Idea: Do ADP backups on a per move basis, not for the whole state space. Theorem: Average value of U(i) converges to the correct value. Theorem: If ? is appropriately decreased as a function of times a state is visited (?=?[N[i]]), then U(i) itself converges to the correct value 时序差分学习 TD T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T TD(l) – A Forward View TD(l) is a method for averaging all n-step backups weight by ln-1 (time since visitation) l-return: Backup using l-return: 时序差分学习算法 TD(?) Idea: update from the whole epoch, not just on state transition. Special cases: ?=1: Least-mean-square (LMS), Mont Carlo ?=0: TD Intermediate choice of ? (between 0 and 1) is best. Interplay with ? … 时序差分学习算法 时序差分学习算法收敛性TD(?) Theorem: Converges w.p. 1 under certain boundaries conditions. Decrease ?i(t) s.t. In practice, often a fixed ? is used for all i and t. 时序差分学习 TD Q-LearningWatkins,1989 Estimate the Q-function using some approximator (for example, linear regression or neural networks or decision trees etc.). Derive the estimated policy as an argument of the maximum of the estimated Q-function. Allow different parameter vectors at different time points. Let us illustrate the algorithm with linear regression as the approximator, and of course, squared error as the appropriate loss function. Q-learning Q (a,i) Direct approach (ADP) would require learning a model . Q-learning does not: Do this update after each state transition: Exploration Tradeoff between exploitation (control) and exploration (identification) Extremes: greedy vs. random acting (n-armed bandit models) Q-learning converges to optimal Q-values i
文档评论(0)