盗用财物若干问题分析word论文.docxVIP

盗用财物若干问题研究摘要面对形形色色的盗用行为，仅通过解释非法占有目的方法已经不能满足处罚盗用的需要。为了解决解释非法占有目的的方法的不足，对比分析中外刑法中对盗用行为的规定，在此基础上，初步提出盗用罪的立法建议。盗用行为应当单独入罪，就可以解决现有法律框架内对盗用行为定性处罚的缺陷。盗用罪，是指具有返还意图，非法使用公私财物，数额较大或者盗用特殊财物、多次盗用的行为。并且创新地阐述了盗用罪的法条设计，为盗用行为单独入罪提供了理论依据。关键词：盗用；非法占有目的；定性；盗用罪IIAbstractEmbezzlementistheactofusingotherpeoplespropertytemporarilyand having intention to return ,which is illegal use of other act. With the developmentofsocialeconomiclevel,assetvaluehumanowningisalsorising, assetswithhugevaluelikecars,helicoptershavealreadyenteredourlives. However,criminalmeansalsobecomemorediversified,forexample:stealing car,stealing ships or cattle,misappropriation houses, misappropriation of computernetworkresourcesandsoon.ThemoreassetsCitizens own,criminal law protection of right of using assets has become more necessary, coupledwith theincreasingnumber of embezzlement,part ofthem hasseriouslyviolatedthepropertyrightsandinterestsofcitizens.Inconclusion Punishmentfor embezzlement behavior should cause ourattention .Toqualitativemisappropriationrigorously,punishpartofthemreasonably andprotectpropertyrightsroundly,misappropriationshouldbetogetanew definition.InJapan,inordertopunishpartofmisappropriation,Japanese scholarshavetriedtoexplainthepurposeofillegalpossessiontointerprete partofthemisappropriationwiththepurposeofillegalpossessionrigidly, whichleadsexpansiontheinterpretationofthethepurposeofillegal possession.Inaddition,atfirstJapanesecourtidentifiedwhetherthe misappropriationshouldbepenalizedbyjudgingwhetherthehumanhasthe returnmeaning,andlater,tomeettheneedoffurtherexpansionofpenalties embezzlement,thecourtstilldeterminedthatthepersonhasthepurposeof illegalpossessionandpunishthemisappropriation,eventhoughthepeople hadreturningintentionwhentransferringproperty.Thisindicatesthatinorder toachievethepurposeofpunishmentpartembezzlement,Japanesecourts expandedtheinterpretation ofpurpose of illegalpossessionandevenconfuse thedefinition.Obviously,thismethodisnotonlyexpansiontheinterpretationof purposeofilleg