MGW10-GT-Korea-AFF-K点击下载源文件到手机、MP4、电脑进行自己编辑哟.doc

Korea Affirmative – sex trafficking Korean sex bases 1ac 3-14 INHERENCY: RAPE NOW 15 INHERENCY: SEX TRAFFICKING NOW 16 INHERENCY: REFORMS FAILING 17 INHERENCY: KOREAN EFFORTS FAILING 18 INHERENCY: MILITARY PRESENCE INCREASING 19-21 RAPE ADVANTAGE EXTENSIONS 22-23 PATRIARCHY IMPACTS 24 SEX TRAFFICKING ADVANTAGE EXTENSIONS 25-27 ETHICS FIRST 28-31 SOLVENCY: WITHDRAWAL OF BASES KEY 33-40 2AC ENVIRONMENT ADD ON 41 2AC BASES BAD ADD ON: LAUNDRY LIST 42 AT: ECONOMY IMPACTS 43-44 AT: FORCED/VOLUNTARY KRITIK 45-47 AT: PITY PARTY KRITIK 48-49 AT: VICTIMIZATION 52-53 AT: NIETZSCHE 54-56 AT: SPEAKING FOR OTHERS BAD 57-60 AT: INTERSECTIONALITY 61-63 AT: BUTLER 64 AT: BUTLER 65 AT: BORDERS 66-86 Korean sex bases 1ac Observation 1: Inherency First, US military basing is expanding in Korea despite opposition by local populations Kirk 2008 (Gwyn, Prof Women’s Studies @ Antioch Hamilton Universities Founder of East Asia-US-Puerto Rico Womens Network Against Militarism, “Gender and U.S. Bases in Asia-Pacific”, March 14, /articles/gender_and_us_bases_in_asia-pacific) The expansion of U.S. military bases and operations has had a huge adverse impact on local communities at social, economic, political, and environmental levels. Host governments and local business elites are complicit in this. They equate progress and economic development with U.S. corporate and military interests instead of addressing the effects of U.S. militarism on local communities. The United States uses political and economic control to exert military force in the Pacific region. Allied nations trade sovereignty for militarized “security.” Japan and South Korea both pay for upkeep of U.S. troops and the restructuring or expansion of U.S. bases in their countries. Guam has yet to attain full self-government through a UN-mandated political process that requires the full cooperation of the United States. The exploitation of Guam’s colonial status has allowed massive military expansion, slated to cost $10 billion,