低流量排烟柜设计及测试之研讨.docVIP

Low Flow Fume Hoods Design and Testing Concerns 低流量排煙櫃設計及測試之研討 The low flow fume hoods are the buzz in the industry. The concept is attractive because the message is simple: 低流量排煙櫃現在工業界已造成某種反應，這種觀念之所以吸引人，道理很簡單： Constant volume hoods that use 40-60% less air than conventional hoods; 為定風量排煙櫃，比傳統排煙櫃風量需求少40-60%。 No complicated VAV controls; 沒有很複雜之變風量控制。 Safety because they can “pass” ASHRAE 110 testing with an ANSI tracer gas concentration criterion. 安全：因為可以引用ANSI偵測氣體濃度之條款，通過ASHRAE 110測試。 The purpose of this bulletin is to:本文之目的為： Review the applicable Codes, Standards, and Guidelines, none of which supports the use of very low face velocities (e.g. 60 ft/min) 檢視各現行法令、標準及指南，均無支持使用此種極低表面風速(如60 ft/min)之有利證明。 Review some of the essential aspects of the ASHRAE 110-1995 Fume Hood Method of Testing Performance of Laboratory Fume Hoods.檢視某些ASHRAE 110-1995實驗室排煙櫃性能測試法之基本觀點。 Dispel some of the myth surrounding the so-called ANSI recommended tracer gas concentration level for fume hoods.消除一些所謂ANSI主張之排煙櫃偵測煙霧濃度之盲點。 Add perspective why a single test method is insufficient to judge the safety performance of a fume hood.增加為何單一的測試方法，不足以評鑑排煙櫃之安全性能的觀點。 Provide reference material that supports the use of higher face velocity to ensure containment when the operators are present, and the hoods are in use with the sash fully open.提供參考資料以證明當使用時調節門於全開位置時，使用較高表面風速可 Low Flow Fume Hoods–Design and Testing Concerns低流量排煙櫃設計及測試相關事宜 There is considerable interest in reducing the laboratory fume hood exhaust flows, in an effort to reduce the first cost and annual operating costs. Low flow fume hoods are not new; in fact, some facilities have been applying low flow hoods for many years. More recently, some hood designers have redesigned the aerodynamic features of their hoods or have restricted the sash openings so that the fume hoods require less air and consequently cost less to operate. As with many approaches with reducing flows you can be sure that there are some shortcomings, alt