resonance corrections共振更正.pptVIP

Correction of sextupole resonances w.p. (6.36,6.22) - N=0.6*10^14,Correction of 3Qx=19 at low intensity w.p. (6.36,6.22) – N=2.0*10^14 w.p. (6.36,6.22) w.p. (6.36,6.22) – N=2.0*10^14, simultaneous correction of 3Qx=19 and 2Qy-Qx=6 resonances Towards VERY high intensity, w.p. and crossed resonances w.p. (6.4,6.3) – towards very high intensity,Simultaneous correction of both sum coupling and 1D resonance Correction of sextupole resonances:w.p. (6.36,6.22) - Correction of 3Qx=19 and 2Qy-Qx=6 Correction of sextupole resonances:w.p. (6.4,6.3) - Correction of sum coupling resonance Qx+2Qy=19 and 3Qx=19 resonance Tentative conclusions (based on correction of sextupole resonances – March 2003) For the test cases of local errors, we found out that detailed correction of resonance without space charge gives good results for the case when such resonance are crossed at high intensity. Strength of correctors used is well within the range. These studies suggest important conclusions: For high intensity operation one can chose working point above the dangerous nonlinear resonance and cross these resonance with relatively low losses at high intensity, provided that one did careful correction of these resonance – it was demonstrated that it is possible to do so. Correction of octupole resonances:w.p. (6.36,6.22), N=1*10^14, Correction of octupole resonance 2Qx+2Qy=25 Correction of octupole resonances:w.p. (6.36,6.22)- N=1*10^14 correction of strong octupole resonance 2Qx+2Qy (b3=120 units) Correction of sextupole and octupole resonance simultaneously: w.p. (6.36,6.22) – N=2*10^14 Correction of skew octupole resonances Correction of skew octupole resonance:w.p. (6.36, 6.22) – Qx+3Qy=25 –sum resonances Effective strength of resonances Error budget In resonance correction studies we assumed lumped b2=30 units and b3, a3 = 60 units which corresponds to 5 times stronger random sextupole errors than measured 10 times stronger skew octupole errors than measured