- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
霍菲尔德的法律概念分析学说
法律概念分析霍菲爾德 楊智傑 老師 生平 Wesley Newcomb Hohfeld (1879-1918) was an American jurist. He was the author of the seminal Fundamental Legal Conceptions, As Applied in Judicial Reasoning and Other Legal Essays, published in 1919. During his life, he published only a handful of law journal articles. At his death, the material forming the basis of Fundamental Legal Conceptions was derived from two articles in the Yale Law Journal (1913) and (1917) that had been partially revised with a view to publication. 權利的性質 Editorial work was undertaken to complete the revisions and the book was published with the inclusion of the manuscript notes that Hohfeld had left, plus seven other essays. The work remains a powerful contribution to modern understanding of the nature of rights and the implications of liberty. To reflect this continuing importance, a chair at Yale University is named after him, which is currently held by Jules Coleman. 「權利」一詞的混用 Hohfeld noticed that even respected jurists conflate various meanings of the term right, sometimes switching senses of the word several times in a single sentence. He wrote that such imprecision of language indicated a concomitant imprecision of thought, and thus also of the resulting legal conclusions. In order to both facilitate reasoning and clarify rulings, he attempted to disambiguate the term rights by breaking it into eight distinct concepts. To eliminate ambiguity, he defined these terms relative to one another, grouping them into four pairs of Jural Opposites and four pairs of Jural Correlatives. 八個概念 Jural Opposites: 1. Right/No-Right 2. Privilege/Duty 3. Power/Disability 4. Immunity/Liability Jural Corelatives: 1. Right/Duty 2. Privilege/No-Right 3. Power/Liability 4. Immunity/Disability 表:法律概念澄清 請求權和自由 Some philosophers and political scientists make a distinction between claim rights and liberty rights. A claim right is a right which entails responsibilities, duties, or obligations on other parties regarding the right-holder.
您可能关注的文档
- 经济系2003级毕业实习计划-工商信息学院-湖北轻工职业技术学院.DOC
- 经皮椎间孔内窥镜下手术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的-中国脊柱脊髓杂志.PDF
- 经皮椎间孔镜下微创治疗成人腰椎间盘突出症效果观察及其对髓核.PDF
- 经皮椎间孔镜下治疗腰椎结核的初步报告-结核病与肺部健康杂志.PDF
- 经皮腰椎间孔成形内窥镜下椎间盘切除术治疗腰-中国脊柱脊髓杂志.PDF
- 结构与组织行为.PPT
- 结构方程模型在物流企业顾客忠诚度研究中的应用情报杂志.PDF
- 结直肠癌患者术后感染的危险因素及病原菌和耐药性-新乡医学院学报.PDF
- 结直肠癌组织中胸苷酸合酶TS表达及临床意义的研究进展-肿瘤药学.PDF
- 结直肠癌的癌前病变筛查-中华流行病学杂志.PDF
最近下载
- 花城版小学音乐一年级下册第16课 《看画听歌——司马光砸缸救人的故事》教学课件.ppt VIP
- 第9课近代西方的法律与教化课件--高二上学期历史选择性必修1.pptx VIP
- UniGear550安装使用说明书cn20081107.pdf VIP
- 2025年中国静脉注射用人免疫球蛋白数据监测研究报告.docx
- 古诗三首·《江南春》课件.pptx
- 培智学校义务教育生活数学课程标准.pdf VIP
- 社区常见病多发病护理常规(22种疾病)2024版.docx
- 监控采购合同模板.docx VIP
- UniGear550-10KV铠式金属开关柜 .ppt VIP
- 2022年北京石油化工学院数据科学与大数据技术专业《计算机组成原理》科目期末试卷B(有答案).docx VIP
文档评论(0)