2010-07-C9会议发言-西安交通大学.PPT

  1. 1、本文档共25页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
2010-07-C9会议发言-西安交通大学

6) Using the Internet to find information and resources (利用因特网来查找信息和资源) 7) Using a computer to communicate with others (使用计算机与他人交流) 8) Using a spreadsheet to model simple processes or financial tables(使用电子表格建立简单的程序模型或财务报表) 9) Using a database system to set up and access useful information(使用数据库系统,建立和访问有用的信息) 10) Using instructional materials to learn how to use new applications or features(使用教材来学习使用新的应用程序或功能) 根据这个报告要求,开设非计算机专业计算机或信息基础课程的学校在美国较为普遍,较为著名的有华盛顿大学的 CSE100: Fluency in Information Technology。 FIT 100:?Fluency in Information Technology?课程网站首页: /fit100/wi10/ the overall success rate (leaving the course with an A, B, or C—not counting those students who received a D, a failing grade, or withdrew from the course) was 78%. * communications of the ACM | may 2009 | vol. 52 | no. 5 推荐者:程向前 西安交通大学 计算机教学实验中心 作者:马克.古士德奥 佐治亚理工 教授 2010.7 西安C9会议上的发言 all students must take a course in computing. We started before publication of the National Research Council (NRC) 1999 report Being Fluent with Information Technology (美版《大学计算机基础》基本要求,类似“白皮书”) 部分译文参见:/xqcheng Though that report significantly influenced implementation. Students would be able “to make algorithmic and data structures choices” when writing programs That simple phrase describes a serious introductory course CS 1321 2/3 students at Georgia Tech teaching everyone on campus meant well over 1,200 students a semester. Textbook Shackelford 《pseudo-code approach to learning》 Felleisen et al.’s 《How to Design Programs text using Scheme》 CS1321 may have been the most hated course on campus the overall success was 78% 46.7% of architecture, 48.5% in management, 47.9% in public policy. females failed at nearly twice the rate of males. several studies were published critiquing computing courses, including the AAUW’s Tech-Savvy report and Unlocking the Clubhouse These reports describe students’ experiences in computing as “tedious,” “asocial,” and surprisingly, “irrelevant.” How could computing be “irrelevant” wh

文档评论(0)

fengruiling + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档