玉米籽粒含水率测定方法的比较-玉米科学.doc

玉米籽粒含水率测定方法比较 （中国农业科学院作物科学研究所/农业部作物生理生态重点实验室，北京100081） 摘要：比较生产中水分仪快速测定玉米籽粒水分与干燥法之间的结果差异，探寻籽粒水分的准确方法。2016和2017年在北京、和新疆等地，利用Kett公司生产的PM-8188-A型高频电容式谷物水分测量仪测定玉米籽粒，并与干燥法进行对比分析。PM-8188-A型水分仪测定结果干燥法之间有显著的差异，%—44%范围内法为准，当籽粒含水率%时水分仪测定直接干燥法高，%时测定直接干燥法低。在25%—32%水分范围内可认为法和直接干燥法之间无显著差异；8%—25%和%—40%的范围可用校正方程y=1.3536x-9.788（R2=0.9745，其中x为水分仪读数）校正表进行校正。直接干燥法相比，水分测量仪的测定具有的局限性，8%—25%和%—40%的范围时后应予以校正。 关键词：籽粒含水率水分仪；法；PM-8188-A The Comparison of Determination Methods of Grain Moisture Content on Maize GAO Shang, LI Lu-Lu, MING Bo, WANG Ke-Ru, XIE Rui-Zhi, BAI Shi-Jie, ZHANG Wan-Xu, HOU Peng, LI Shao-Kun Institute of Crop Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology and Ecology, Beijing 100081 Abstract: The aim of the study is to compare the difference between the results of direct determination of grain moisture content of maize by moisture meter and the direct drying method, and to explore the rapid and accurate test method of grain moisture content of maize. The grain moisture content of maize was determined by Kett PM-8188-A high-frequency capacitive grain moisture meter in Beijing, Henan and Xinjiang in 2016 and 2017, and compared with the direct-drying method. The results of PM-8188-A cereal moisture meter showed significant difference with direct-drying method. The grain moisture content of maize was in the range of 10% -40%(direct-drying method as the standard). When the grain moisture content of maize was lower, the moisture meter was higher than the direct drying method, and when the moisture content was higher, the moisture meter was lower than the direct-drying method. There is no significant difference between the moisture meter method and the direct-drying method in the range of 25% -32% moisture; the calibration equation above this range can be used with the correction equation y = 1.3536x-9.788 (R2 = 0.9745, x is the moisture meter reading ) to correct. In conclusion, Compared with the direct drying method, the moisture content of