网站大量收购闲置独家精品文档,联系QQ:2885784924

汉语限制焦点“只”的儿童语言习得分析-an analysis of childrens language acquisition with chinese restricted focus.docx

汉语限制焦点“只”的儿童语言习得分析-an analysis of childrens language acquisition with chinese restricted focus.docx

  1. 1、本文档共81页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
汉语限制焦点“只”的儿童语言习得分析-an analysis of childrens language acquisition with chinese restricted focus

AbstractChildren?s acquisition of restrictive focus adverbs is a hot issue in the language acquisition research. In Chinese, adults tend to associate the pre-subject restrictive focus adverb zhi ?only? with the subject. For example, Zhiyou Mali chi-le xiangjiao ?Only Mary ate a banana? means that except Mary, no one else ate a banana. Whether children and adults have the same understanding of the relationship between the syntactic position of zhi ?only? and the elements it restricts is a problem worth exploring. In this study, two investigations with the Truth Value Judgment Task were conducted to investigate Chinese children?s interpretations of pre-subject zhi ?only? through the comparison between adults and children.Previous studies of children?s acquisition of restrictive focus operator zhi ?only? mainly have yielded two major findings. The first one is that children tend to understand pre-subject zhi ?only? as preverbal zhi ?only?. That is to say, children think sentences like Zhiyou Mali chi-le xiangjiao ?Only Mary ate a banana? has the same meaning as Mali zhi chi-le xiangjiao?Mary only ate a banana?. The other aspect that aroused researchers? interest is that in interpreting ambiguous sentences of preverbal zhi ?only?, children would adopt the semantic subset principle, while adults follow the principle of parsimony. For example, the sentence Xiaonanhai zhi bei-zhe shubao ?The little boy is only carrying a bag?, adults would think it is correct as long as what the little boy is carrying is a bag, no matter whether he is also holding a flower spot or flying a kite, etc. However, children will accept the sentence under the condition that all the activities the little boy is doing is carrying a bag. The present study focuses on the first point. We want to know whether children have VP-focus tendency when interpreting pre-subject zhi and testify whether negation could assist children in reaching the adult-like interpretation of pre-subject zhi mentioned in Zhou

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

peili2018 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档