h高校超市商品供应商评价分析-h evaluation and analysis of supermarket commodity suppliers in colleges and universities.docx

AbstractBecause of the rapid development of education in China in recent years ,university supermarket gradually scale. How to make a reasonable evaluation of the many small-scale suppliers become a bottleneck in the development of university supermarket. Therefore , this article start from the status and related theory of the supplier evaluation and selection , based on a large number of the research on the supplier evaluation indicators and evaluation methods of domestic and foreign scholars , combined with the actual situation and evaluation of the status quo of H university ,then proposed the supplier evaluation index system for H university supermarket, and then evaluate some existing suppliers by fuzzy analytic hierarchy process for H university supermarket.This study mainly includes the following aspects: The establishment of supplier evaluation index system, supplier evaluation , supplier selection, etc. In the part of supplier evaluation index system, this article is on the basis of consulting a large number of selected research on the evaluation index of domestic and foreign scholars, combined with the problems of H university supermarket and the characteristics of the supplier evaluation. In the part of supplier evaluation model, this article is on the basis of consulting a lot of existing supplier evaluation methods and analysis their inadequacies , then combined the properties of supplier evaluation index ,finally, this paper decided to use the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process, taking into account the ease of using FAHP with a 0.1-0.9 scale method and the method of expert evaluation .Finally, this article evaluate some exiting supplier of H university supermarket using the established supplier evaluation index system with the method of FAHP, by example to explain how to use FAHP and established supplier evaluation index system to evaluate supplier, through the evaluation results to illustrate the practical and rationality of the evaluation indicators a