GRE范文及赏析Argument132智课网.pdf

智课网GRE 备考资料 GRE 官方写作题库Argument 132 The following appeared in a letter to the school board in the town of Centerville: All students should be required to take the drivers education course at Centerville High School. In the past two years, several accidents in and around Centerville have involved teenage drivers. Since a number of parents in Centerville have complained that they are too busy to teach their teenagers to drive, some other instruction is necessary to ensure that these teenagers are safe drivers. Although there are two driving schools in Centerville, parents on a tight budget cannot afford to pay for driving instruction. Therefore an effective and mandatory program sponsored by the high school is the only solution to this serious problem. Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted. 满分范文赏析 This letter recommends mandatory drivers education courses at Centerville High School based on three facts: during the last two years several Centerville car accidents have involved teenage drivers, Centerville parents are too busy to teach driving to their children, and the two private driver- education courses in the area are unaffordable. The argument suffers from several critical flaws. Let us look a more deeply. 【此段结构】 本段采用了标准的 Argument 开头段结构，即：C – E - F 的开头结构，首句概括原文的 C(Conclusion)。接下来的一句话概括了原文为了支持他的结论所引用的 E(Evidence)。最后尾句 中给出开头段到正文段的过渡句，指出原文在逻辑上存在 F(Flaw)。 【此段功能】 本段作为 Argument 开头段，具体功能就在发起攻击。首先，概括原文的结论：信中推荐 Centerville(后面简称 C)高中进行强制 drivers education。接下来分别列举了原文为了支持这个 结论引用的三个证据：过去两年有几起青少年的交通事故，C 地区父母没时间教孩子开车， 当地两个驾驶课程很难负担的起。最后点出原文存在逻辑错误，引出后面的分析。 First of all, while teenagers were involved in acc