基于德尔菲法筛选大学体育课程内容标准具体指标.docVIP

基于德尔菲法筛选大学体育课程内容标准具体指标 　　 收稿日期：2011-07-06 　　 基金项目：全国教育科学规划课题(BLA010105)。 　　 作者简介：郭太玮（1965-），女，副教授，博士研究生，研究方向：体育人文社会学。 　　 摘 要：为了对大学体育课程内容标准体系中具体指标条目进行甄别和筛选。采用德尔菲法对备选的48条具体指标条目进行4轮专家意见征询，有45名高等学校体育教学指导委员会委员，35名大学公体部主任参与专家征询。经2轮预调查和2轮正式征询的专家积极性系数分别为100%、100%、88.75%和77.50%；专家的权威程度达到可接受值(≥0.70)比例为86.7%、100%、87.3%和88.7%；专家意见一致性系数(Kendall’s W，肯德尔和谐指数)分别为0.311、0.628、0.320和0.531；运动参与、运动技能、身体健康、心理健康和社会适应5领域1级指标类的权重分别为12.5%、29.9%、24.7%、22.5%和10.4%。经过２轮的正式征询，最后筛选出5个领域共30个具体指标条目。 　　关 键 词：学校体育；大学体育课程；德尔菲法 　　中图分类号：G807 文献标识码：A 文章编号：1006-7116(2012)02-0089-05 　　 　　Specific indexes of college physical education curriculum content standards screened based on the Delphi method 　　GUO Tai-wei1，2，PAN Shao-wei1，JI Liu2 　　（1.School of Physical Education，Yangzhou University，Jiangsu 225009，China； 　　2.School of Physical Education and Healthy，East China Normal University，Shanghai 200241，China） 　　 　　Abstract: In order to identify and screen specific indexes in the college physical education curriculum content standard system, the authors used the Delphi method to carry out 4 rounds of expert opinion consultation on 48 optional specific indexes. 45 members of college physical education teaching guidance committees and 35 directors of college public sports departments participated in expert opinion consultation. After 2 rounds of preliminary investigation and 2 rounds of official consultation, the expert enthusiasm coefficients were 100%, 100%, 88.75% and 77.50% respectively; the percentages of acceptability (≥0.70) of expert authority were 86.7%, 100%, 87.3% and 88.7%; the expert opinion consistency coefficients (Kendall’s W harmony index) were 0.311, 0.628, 0.320 and 0.531 respectively; the weights for level 1 indexes in such 5 areas as sports participation, sports skills, physical health, mental health and social adaptation were 12.5%, 29.9%, 24.7%, 22.5% and 10.4% respectively. After 2 rounds of official consultation, totally 30 specific indexes in 5 areas were screened out. 　　K