利奥塔(第三部分文本解读).pptxVIP

文本梳理 关于“后现代”，牵涉到许多论争。我将厘清其中的三个方面： There are many debates implied by, and implicated in, the term ’postmodern’. I will distinguish three of them.（para.3) 文章可分为三个部分： 第一部分：para.4~para.7 第二部分：para.8~para.12 第三部分：para.13 第一部分(para.4~7) 建筑 In this account there is no longer a horizon of universalization, of general emancipation before the eyes of postmodern man, or in particular, of the postmodern architect. The disappearance of this idea of progress within rationality and freedom would explain a certain tone, style or modus which are specific to postmodern architecture. I would say a sort of bricolage: the high frequency of quotations of elements from previous styles or periods (classical or modern), giving up the consideration of environment, and so on. （para.5) 因此，在后现代人眼中，特别是后现代建筑师眼中，普遍主义化的进程、普遍解放的进程，并不存在着界限。对理性与自由的发展的信念已经消失了，这将衍生出某种声调、风格、以及方法来具体地适用于后现代建筑学。我将做出一些完善：在不考虑环境等因素的情况下，频繁地引用以前的风格或时代（古典的或现代的）的元素。 The idea of modernity is closely bound up with this principle that it is possible and necessary to break with tradition and to begin a new way of living and thinking. Today we can presume that this ‘breaking’ is, rather, a manner of forgetting or repressing the past. That’s to say of repeating it. Not overcoming it. (para.6,line 7) 这种现代性的观念与以下这种准则紧密相关：我们可以，或者说必须，打破传统，并采用一种全新的生存方式和思考方式。当下，我们可以预测这种突破更像是一种对过去的适度遗忘和压抑。换言之，是重复过去，而非颠覆过去。 第二部分(para8~12) 后现代术语内涵 One can note a sort of decay in the confidence placed by the last two centuries in the idea of progress. （para.9,line 1) 在近两个世纪中，对“发展”的信念遭遇了一系列的危机。 This idea of progress as possible, probable or necessary was rooted in the certainty that the development of the arts, technology, knowledge and liberty would be profitable to ma