北京语言大学考博英语模拟真题和其解析.pdfVIP

中国考博辅导首选学校 北京语言大学考博英语模拟真题及其解析 It ispossible for students to obtain advanced degrees inEnglish while knowing littleornothing about traditional scholarlymethods. The consequences of this neglect of traditional scholarshi are particularlyunfortunate forthe studyofwomenwriters. Ifthecanon — the list of authors whose works are most widely taught — is ever to include more women, scholars must be well trained in historical scholarshi and textual editing.Scholarswho donotknowhow toread early manuscripts, locate rare books, establish a sequence of editions,andsoonarebereftofcrucialtoolsforrevisingthecanon. To address suchconcerns,anexperimentalversionof theGeng duo yuan xiao wan zheng kao bo ying yu zhen ti ji qi jie xi qing lian xi quan guo mian fei zi xun dian hua: si ling ling liu liu ba liu jiu qi ba ,huo jia zi xun qq: qi qi er liu qi ba wu san qi traditional scholarly methods course was designed to raise students’ consciousness about the usefulness of traditional learning for any modern critic or theorist.To minimize the artificial aspects of the conventional course, theusual procedure of assigning a largenumber of small problems drawn from the entire range of historical periods was abandoned, though thisprocedure has the obvious advantage of at least superficially familiarizing students with a wide range of reference sources. Instead students were engaged in a collective effort to do originalwork on a neglected eighteenth-centurywriter, Elizabeth Griffith, to give them an authentic experience of literary scholarshi andtoinspirethemtotakeresponsibilityforthequality 中国考博辅导首选学校 of their own work. Griffith’s work presented a number of advantages for this particularpedagogicalpurpose.First,thebodyofextantscholarshi on Griffith was so tiny that it could all be read in a day; thus students spent little time and effort mastering the