VEGF-CVEGFR-3与podoplanin在食管癌中的表达及其意义.docVIP

VEGF-CVEGFR-3与podoplanin在食管癌中的表达及其意义.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
VEGF-CVEGFR-3与podoplanin在食管癌中的表达及其意义

VEGF-C、VEGFR-3和podoplanin在食管癌中的表达及其意义 (作者:___________单位: ___________邮编: ___________) 【摘要】 目的 观察血管内皮生长因子C(VEGF-C)及其受体3(VEGFR-3)和肾小球上皮细胞整合膜蛋白(podoplanin)在食管癌组织中的表达,分析其与肿瘤淋巴结转移的关系。方法 免疫组织化学SP法检测76例食管癌组织中VEGF-C、VEGFR-3和podoplanin的表达及淋巴管密度(LVD)。结果 食管癌VEGF-C表达阳性率为63.1%,VEGF-C的表达与食管癌的淋巴结转移、TNM分期有统计学意义(P0.01, P0.05),但与患者年龄、肿瘤大小及分化程度无关;癌旁组织淋巴管密度同淋巴结转移、VEGF-C阳性表达间有统计学意义(P0.01, P0.05),podoplanin LVD值与VEGFR-3 LVD值相比,具有统计学意义(P0.01)。结论 食管癌组织中VEGF-C表达与肿瘤TNM分期、淋巴管密度和淋巴结转移有关,VEGF-C表达越高,淋巴管密度越大,淋巴结转移可能性越高。癌旁组织LVD同VEGF-C的高表达及淋巴结转移密切相关,食管癌组织中podoplanin标记的淋巴管密度较VEGFR-3标记的淋巴管密度更为精确,是一种更为满意的淋巴管内皮特异性标志物。 【关键词】 食管癌;淋巴结转移;血管内皮生长因子C;血管内皮生长因子受体-3;podoplanin   ABSTRACT: Objective To investigate the expression of vascular endothelial growth factorC (VEGF-C), its receptor3 (VEGFR-3) and podoplanin in tissue of esophageal cancer, and the relationship between their expression and tumor lymphatic metastasis. Methods Expression of VEGF-C, VEGFR-3 and podoplanin in 76 cases of ESC was detected by immunohistochemical SP method and lymphatic vessel density (LVD) was calculated. Results Positive immunostaining of VEGF-C in esophageal cancer tissue was 63.1%; the expression of VEGF- C was significantly associated with the depth of lymph node metastasis and tumor invasion (P0.01, P0.05, respectively), but not with the patient age, tumor size or differentiation. The average level of LVD was 15.39?.14, VEGFR-3 marked LVD was 9.27?.39, and podoplanin marked LVD was 22.09?.59. There were significant differences (P0.01). Conclusion There are clinical significance correlations VEGF-C expression, LVD expression and lymph node metastasis in esophageal cancer. The higher VEGF-C expression and LVD expression in esophageal cancer, the higher risk of lymph node metastasis in esophageal cancer; podoplanin marked LVD is more precise than VEGFR-3 marked LVD, and expression of podoplanin correlates closely with high expression of VEGF-C and LVD. It is a satisfactory lymphangial endothelium marker.   KEY WORDS

文档评论(0)

erterye + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档