LBNL Damping Ring Ramp;D Plan●阻尼环Ramp；D计划.pptVIP

Damping Ring EDR Plans Michael S. Zisman, Jie Gao, Susanna Guiducci, Andy Wolski DR Area System Leaders Introduction ILC DR RD planning is moving to a more top-down approach work package choices being tailored to meet EDR requirements a change from earlier proposal-driven approach we wish to drive the proposals, not vice versa coordination S3 Task Force oversees global DR RD Program and will monitor its progress One difficulty is lack of clear understanding of what the EDR is supposed to represent how much engineering vs. completing RD tasks? what RD demonstrations are needed to proceed with EDR? RD Priorities Demonstration of viable baseline configuration solution(s) to electron cloud instability wigglers, arcs, straights change to single PDR makes this a very high priority solution to fast ion instability observation of 2 pm vertical emittance at ATF or elsewhere provision of finalized lattice adequate dynamic aperture with realistic errors suitable correction schemes to preserve low emittance appropriate adjustability coupling correction, tunes, momentum compaction resistance to instabilities Benchmarked simulation codes are “deliverables” Engineering Priorities (1) Demonstration of acceptable technical solutions fast kicker system rise and fall times; amplitude and timing jitter; reliability wiggler vacuum system design wiggler magnet design overall vacuum system design vacuum performance; low impedance; low SEY bellows, valves, bpm stability, bakeout issues supports and alignment adequate stability and alignment adjustability for both rings in one tunnel RF system cryostat, cavity, HOM damping Engineering Priorities (2) magnet power system control of magnets individually; acceptable heat load to tunnel; reliability diagnostics with adequate performance to see instabilities precision; stability; dynamic range Coordination Issues There is complementarity among regions in a number of DR activities Europe electron cloud instability fast kickers wiggler modeli