马克思在《资本论》中所论述的关于技术、资本、劳动三者的关系,与新古典经济学关于三者关系的论述有何不同.docVIP

专门史 杜飞 10011309115 马克思在《资本论》中所论述的关于技术、资本、劳动三者的关系，与新古典经济学关于三者关系的论述有何不同？ On Capital aboubt the relations among the technology, capital, labor. Marx argued that wages, are not a share of the worker in the commodities produced by himself. Wages are that part of already existing commodities with which the capitalist buys a certain amount of productive labor-power. The law of profit margins tend to decline. General rate of profit is not fixed and the general level of profitability depends on the total residual value of the whole society with the total capital ratio of the whole society. Only the variable capital of the total social capital produces surplus value, constant capital does not produce surplus value. With the development of capitalism, technology continues to progress,and labor productivity improves, will inevitably lead a significant increase of constant capital, the portion of variable capital relatively grow narrow. Therefore, profit margins have been declining gradually, this is the law of the falling profit margins. Capital and wage labor antagonistic relations of production. This is the foundation of capitalist society and the social life of the axis of operation. It should be noted that the representatives of capital are talking about here is the bourgeois , not individuals, as individuals have to participate in the capitalist labor, but as the bourgeoisie, the class belongs to exploiting class. Surplus value and relative surplus value production. Surplus value is the difference between the value of labor and the value of labor resource, as it is pursuit of the direct purpose of production in a social commodity economy. Capital is generally the capital of the common trait, that is, the value caised by a residual value.It is the movement of the continuous increase of value, and it is the link to run the commodity economy. Relative surplus value is caused by the social labor time caused by improving the technology and equipment. Relative surplu