哲学科学哲学Ch5库恩ppt模版课件.pptVIP

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
哲学科学哲学Ch5库恩ppt模版课件

Ch5、库恩 一、Kuhn 著作: The Copernican Revolution (1957) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (SSR) (1962) The Essential Tension (1977) The Black-body Problem and the Quantum Discontinuity, 1894-1912 (1979,1984) Steven Weinberg: “What does bother…on rereading Structure and some of Kuhn’s later writings is his radically sceptical conclusions (sic.) about what is accomplished in the work of science. And it is just these conclusions that have made Kuhn a hero to the philosophers, historians, sociologists and cultural critics who question the objective character of scientific knowledge, who prefer to describe scientific theories as social constructions, not so different from democracy or baseball.” ‘Kuhn’s view of scientific progress would leave us with a mystery. Why does anyone bother? If one scientific theory is only better than another in its ability to solve problems that happen to be on our minds today, then why not save ourselves a lot of trouble by putting these problems out of our minds? We don’t study elementary particles because they are intrinsically interesting like people -- if you’ve seen one electron you’ve seen them all. What drives us onward in the work of science is precisely the sense that there are truths out there to be discovered, truths that once discovered will form a permanent part of human knowledge’ 二、科学史和科学哲学 Kuhn的科学史“case studies”意在说明一般采取的关于科学变化的理解是根本错误的。 科学史的角色? the very influential contemporary distinction between the context of discovery and the context of justification … Having been weaned intellectually on these distinctions…, I could scarcely be more aware of their import and force… . Yet my attempts to apply them…to the actual situations in which knowledge is gained, accepted and assimilated have made them seem extraordinarily problematic. Rather than being elementary logical or methodological distinctions, they now seem integral parts of a traditional set of substantive answers to the very questions upon which they have been deplo

文档评论(0)

a888118a + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档