Input - World Health Organization输入-世界卫生组织.pptVIP

STRENGTHENING MONITORING and EVALUATION of NATIONAL AIDS PROGRAMMES in the CONTEXT of the EXPANDED RESPONSE February 4-6 2002 Dakar, Senegal Monitoring AND Evaluation Monitoring: What are we doing? Tracking inputs and outputs to assess whether program are performing according to plans (e.g. people trained, condoms distributed) Evaluation: What have we achieved? Assessment of impact of the programme on behaviour or health outcome (e.g. condom use at last risky sex, HIV incidence) Global Initiative to Improve ME of AIDS programs at the National Level Goal: To help countries develop sustainable and effective ME systems Coordination: UNAIDS, WHO, USAID, CDC in collaboration with World Bank, European Commission, FHI, MEASURE and many others Global Initiative to Improve ME of AIDS programs at the National Level (2) Process: 1998 Review of existing practices, systems and instruments (13 countries); 1999-2000: four consensus-building / technical meetings with stakeholders 2000: Publication of UNAIDS guide (English) 2001: Publication of UNAIDS guide (French) Country workshops (Africa - 25 countries) April 2001 - Entebbe Feb 2002 - Senegal Apr 2002 - Kampala (training in ME) Apr 2003 - Dakar Coordination: MERG, GAMET Lesson Learned: 5 Elements of a Good Monitoring and Evaluation System Presence Monitoring and Evaluation unit Clear goals and objectives of the program A core set of indicators and targets A plan for data collection and analysis A plan for data dissemination Monitoring and Evaluation Unit No functioning unit for ME 1 or 2 persons responsible for the whole country Very limited resources for ME No formalised links with technical and other resources Established ME unit within the NAC and MoH Specific expertise in or affiliated with the unit: (ME, epi, behavioural, statistics, data dissemination) Budget (10% of the national AIDS budget with national contribution) Formalised links with the research institutions, leading NGOs and donors Clear goals