- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
SEP监测在甲基泼尼松龙防治脊髓损伤中作用
SEP监测在甲基泼尼松龙防治脊髓损伤中的作用
【摘要】 目的 探讨脊柱手术中体感诱发电位(SEP)监测脊髓功能在指导甲基泼尼松龙(MP)大剂量冲击治疗脊髓损伤中的价值。方法 颈、胸椎手术病人280例,术前SEP正常术中SEP变化未达到预警标准168例。术前SEP异常术中SEP变化未达到预警标准80例,分为两组,A1组40例术中应用大剂量MP冲击疗法,B1组40例应用甘露醇和地塞米松常规治疗,观察两组早期脊髓功能改善情况。SEP术中达到预警标准32例分为两组:A2组22例治疗同A1组,B2组10例治疗同B1组,观察两组早期脊髓功能改善情况。结果 SEP术中未达到预警标准术前无SEP异常者168例,术后无脊髓损伤症状。A1组与B1组比较,神经症状改善情况无显著统计学差异。A2组与B2组比较,神经症状改善情况有显著性差异(P=0.005)。结论 SEP术中监测达到预警标准,高度怀疑脊髓受到损伤时,及时应用大剂量MP可有效防治脊髓继发性损伤的发生、发展,促进脊髓功能恢复。而对已有的脊髓慢性损伤,术前SEP异常,但术中SEP监测未达到预警标准,应用MP冲击治疗效果欠佳。
【关键词】 诱发电位 躯体感觉 脊髓损伤 甲基泼尼松龙 治疗结果
[ABSTRACT] Objective To evaluate the clinical value of somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) in monitoring the function of spinal cord and guiding the use of methylprednisolone pulse therapy during surgery for spinal cord injury. Methods Among 280 cases of cervical and thoracic operation, 168 showed normal SEP preoperatively but the changes did not reached the precaution standard at surgery, 80 showed abnormal SEP preoperatively and the changes of SEP at operation did not reached the precaution standard. The latter 80 cases were evenly divided into two groups: group A1, treated with methylprednisolone pulse therapy; group B1, received routine treatment with mannitol and dexamethasone. For those 32 cases which reached the precaution standard at operation were divided into two groups: group A2 (22 cases) and group B2 (10). Group A2 got the same therapy as group A1, group B2 received the same therapy as group B1. The earlystage improvement of spinal cord function of the above four groups was observed. Results For 168 cases with normal preoperative SEP but did not reached the precaution standard value of SEP at operation showed no symptoms of spinal cord injury. There was no significant differences between group A1 and group B1 in terms of the improvement of neurological symptoms; while the differences between group A2 and group B2 were statistically different (P=0.005). Conclusion When SEP reached presentiment standard, which highly suggested spinal cor
文档评论(0)