民事诉讼与解制度研究.docVIP

民事诉讼和解制度研究 摘 要 随着我国法制化进程的发展，越来越多的人更倾向于将纠纷诉诸于法院，以期得到公正、高效的判决，由此引发了法院压力日益加重，法官工作量超负荷等问题。如何能够寻求一种比以往的审判更为迅捷的纠纷处理方式已经成为各国司法界普遍关注的问题。几经探索之后，世界各国相继建立起了民事诉讼和解制度。这一制度建立在当事人合意的基础上，实现了纠纷解决的及时性和彻底性，同时，这一制度也有效缓解了诉讼费用过高等问题，实现了权利救济大众化的需求。2012年8月31日第十一届全国人民代表大会常务委员会第二十八次会议通过了民事诉讼法修正案，但遗憾的是对于民事诉讼和解制度仍然没有做出具体的规定。与域外国家和地区民事诉讼和解制度相比，我国民事诉讼和解制度没有发挥其应有的作用，在当今诉讼爆炸的形势下，不利于民事纠纷的迅速高效地解决，如何完善民事诉讼和解制度成为当下亟待解决的问题。本文从民事诉讼和解制度的概念入手，对域外国家和地区的民事诉讼和解制度进行了比较研究，在分析了我国民事诉讼和解制度现状的基础上，提出了完善我国民事诉讼和解制度的建议，以期为完善我国民事诉讼立法提供一己之力。 关键词：民事诉讼和解制度，诉权理论，当事人的处分原则，自愿原则， 瑕疵救济  THE STUDY OF RECONCILIATION IN CIVIL ACTION SYSTEM ABSTRACT With the development of Chinas legalization process, more and more people are intended to resort to the court, in order to get a fair and efficient decision. The resulting court pressure increasing, the judge work overload. More than ever, how to search for a more speedy trial of disputes have become a national justice sector in general issues of concern. After exploring several times, the Nations of the world have established the reconciliation in civil action system. This system is established on a consensual basis by the parties, it had realized the timeliness and thoroughness to resolve disputes, at the same time, this system has also been effectively alleviate the cost of litigation and so on, realizing rights remedy popular demand. August 31, 2012, adopted at the 28th session of the Standing Committee of the 11th NPC has amendments to the Civil Procedure Act, but unfortunately for civil reconciliation system still didn’t make specific provision. Compared with the extraterritorial civil reconciliation system in countries and areas, civil mediation system in China didn’t play its role. In the context of todays litigation explosion, it didn’t quickly and efficiently resolve the civil disputes. How to perfect the civil reconciliation system has become a pressing issue. This article starts with from the concept of reconciliation system of civil action, foreign countries and regions a