义利王霸之辩.DOC

南 开 大 学 本 科 生 学 年 论 文 题目：道德理想主义与历史现实主义 ——从朱熹陈亮的“义利王霸之辩”看南宋儒学的两条路向 摘 要 朱熹和陈亮的“义利王霸之辩”并非如表面所呈现的那样仅仅局限于“义利”、“王霸”的辩论。在这场耗日持久的论战中，朱熹的史学观根源于“天理”本体，其所追求的永恒价值呈现为理论思辨层面和实践两条脉络；而陈亮的史学观更重视历史运行之道，他为了解决不同历史情境下的现实问题而提出了“道至公而时行”的事功之学。陈亮思想中显现出自觉的历史意识，朱熹与陈亮就此展开了激烈的论辩，从此展现出南宋儒学发展的的两条路向：“道德理想主义”与“历史现实主义”。从这条历史脉络和当时的社会现实、对后世学术发展的影响来看，两人的辩论是一场儒家内部长久以来的道德理想主义传统与在以往的史学实践中发展起来的历史现实主义先声的交锋。 关键词：义利王霸之辩；事功之学；天理；道德理想主义；历史现实主义 Abstract Zhu Xi and Chen Liangs Defense of justice and interest and defense of wang dao and ba dao is not confined to the debate of justice and interest,wang dao and ba dao as it appears. In this long-running debate, Zhu Xis view of history is rooted in the li of heaven and the eternal value he was looking for presents as two directions：the theoretical one and the practical one. On the other hand,Cheng Liang’s view of history thought more highly of the dao of running history.In order to solve the practical problems in different historical situations,Chen Liang put forward the theory :Dao is the most public and runs adapting to time.. Chen Liang showed conscious historical consciousness in his thought. Thus Zhu Xi and Chen Liang made a sharp debate about it,showing the two directions of the development of Confucianism in the Southern Song Dynasty: Moral Idealism and Historical realism. From the historical context and the social reality at that time, the influence on the later academic development, the debate between the two men is a long-standing traditional debate of moral idealism within Confucianism and a historical realist avant-garde that has been developed in the past. Keywords: Defense of justice and interest;Defense of wang dao and ba dao ;Utilitarianism of Chen Liang;The li of heaven;Moral idealism;Historical realism 目 录 引论 5 一、 陈亮的学派归属和学术渊源 6 二、 朱陈之辩涉及到的几个具体问题及其背后的本质 10 （一）“天道”与“人事”之辩：天理本体之“道”与历史运行之“道”的对立 10 （二）“三代”与“汉唐”之辩：理学与史学的第二次碰撞 14 （三）“义利王霸”之辩：基于本心的永恒价值与基于公利的事功伦理 20 三、结论与后论：道德理想主义神圣性的破灭和历史现实主义的显现 23 参考文献： 28  引论 朱熹和陈亮的“义利王霸之辩”是中国思想史上的一段著名公案，同时也是二人对此问题